Legalectric

The “Elk Run” coal plant proposed by LS Power for Waterloo is moving forward. They’ve been holding meetings in Waterloo and Cedar Falls. Clean Air Waterloo is organizing opposition to the plant and have just started a blog. A meeting last night at the Waterloo library was packed, and people are just starting to get information about the plant. The first official meeting held by the power plant promoters and the Iowa Utilities Board isn’t scheduled until May:

May 11
LS Power/Elk Run Energy Associates, LLC public meeting
Waterloo’s Five Sullivan Brothers Convention Center @ 6 p.m.

Dunkerton schools, Waterloo would see large benefits from power plant tax revenue

600 petition against power plant

Power plant annexation possibilities concern county residents

LS Power options additional land for power plant site

Something tells me that a lot of people will wake up before that meeting in May!

The SD 25 Endorsing Convention is next week.

I don’t know much about the Senate District, other than that it’s more conservative out west, and for the Senate District, there’s a lot more district out there, so a Senate candidate must have a base in Northfield and strong support with the more conservative voters out west.

As for the House District, I do know a fair amount about that. To win in 25B, it requires at least a 65% margin in Northfield, consistent with the DFL index, a showing in the 40’s elsewhere in the District, with at least 50% in Belle Plaine.

Here are the 2004 numbers, precinct by precinct. View image

For more information, or for other years, go to the Secretary of State website and go to “Elections.”

Funny how it’s all connected…
Funny how it’s all a big game of CHICKEN!!!
… or is it a TURKEY???? … or… oh I’d better shut up…

“Big Ag” Christian Sande v. “IATP” Mark Ritchie

Christian Sande and Mark Ritchie are both vying for the DFL endorsement for Secretary of State. Yeah, we all know that.

Mark Ritchie has been very open and proud of his tenure with IATP.

Yet I don’t hear a “peep” on Christian Sande’s site about his years as a lobbyist for Gold-N Plump and Jennie-O!

Sande was a lobbyist for Jennie-O from 12/23/99 to 9/24/04, and for Gold-N Plump from 12/23/99 to 5/9/05, and announced for Secretary of State the following week. Sande also lobbied for the Minnesota Milk Producers Association in 2001. Nowhere on Sande’s site does it state that he’s spent many years lobbying for Big Ag.

But there’s something for Ritchie to crow about — he won the DFL “straw poll” with 38% to Sande’s 16%.

Here’s Sande’s Campaign Finance Report for 2005.

And here’s Ritchie’s Campaign Finance Report for 2005.

… if I thought Sande could pull ahead, this would bother me — ties to “BIG AG” something I’d sure want to know about a candidate…

Oh, and the IATP site has a good piece headlining about arsenic in chicken — Playing Chicken.

buck-aw, buck, buck, buck, buck… buck-aaaaw

Half Moon Lake — I know, it’s “East Range” but it’s one of my all time favorite photos

(Here’s the short report, will fill out sometime when I’m not breaking out in coughing fits)

It’s not too bad a day when PUC Commissioners use the words “Intervenor Compensation” without visibly gagging, and to have “consideration” of Intervenor Compensation actually written into an order… not that it will ever really be ordered. It was good to see some recognition of what it takes, the effort and resources to intervene in this, where all the “players” are well-funded corporations, profit and “non-profit” alike. Will post the Order when it’s official.

Saxhaug’s SF 2570 got through tax, and the amendment providing for local government approval and Host Fee Agreement remained intact.

County will not likely foot charge for aeriel photography bill for infrastructure work

And my LTE of the day:

Why give up tax revenue for Mesaba?

Editor:

Iâ??m an â??outsider,â? as Tom Micheletti says, â??Sheâ??s from Red Wing!â? But utility personal property tax is an issue from my own backyard. In 1997, I argued with Micheletti against cutting the rates paid by utilities because that tax was â??compensationâ? for life with a nuclear power plant. Tom, as NSPâ??s main lobbyist, succeeded in slashing the tax. Goodhue County, Red Wing and the school district lost over $10 million annually!

Utility personal property tax came up again last year, when I represented a client who lived near a proposed power plant near Waseca. Her legislators introduced a bill exempting that plant from millions in tax, and they did not inform the local governments. Those legislators gave away tax revenue, and worse, they left out any requirement that the power plant negotiate a Host Fee Agreement. We worked hard, scrambling to bring the county and township up to speed, and they passed resolutions requiring a Host Fee Agreement.

And yet here we go again — your legislators did the same thing to you. Sen. Saxhaug and Rep. Solberg, joined by Dill, Anderson and Moe, â??authoredâ? and introduced bills to exempt Excelsiorâ??s plant from millions of dollars annually utility personal property tax. They did this without consulting local governments and without giving them notice.
Wasnâ??t this project going to provide community benefits, not take them away? In addition, the RAMS lobbyist, Ron Dicklich, didnâ??t let Itasca County know, and theyâ??re paying him to protect local interests and keep them informed. And it gets worse — these bills were introduced at the same time that legislators and local governments were meeting regularly about the $55 million Excelsior bonding bill, so it seems that they can communicate when they want the county to ask for Excelsiorâ??s infrastructure funding, but they canâ??t say â??by the way, thereâ??s this exemption billâ?¦â?
Keep a watch on SF 2570 and HF 3020.

Meanwhile, the Public Utilities Commission is reviewing Excelsior’s petition to force Xcel to sign an agreement to purchase the capacity of the Mesaba plant. This Power Purchase Agreement will provide equity necessary for Mesaba to go forward. Iâ??ve requested that they send all documents to local libraries. Have they? Information is available at www.puc.state.mn.us and click on â??eDocketsâ? and plug in the Docket No. 05-1993. Thursday, the PUC will determine how this matter will proceed.

Please tell your legislators and county commissioners what you think about the impacts, costs and benefits of this project. Itâ??s our job as citizens to speak up. The county board has demonstrated its ability to step up and protect the county, and they deserve loud and hearty thanks.

Carol A. Overland
Representing local landowners near the â??westâ? site
Red Wing

Go figure… we’ve got an appeal pending, argued the Motion to Dismiss and have received a Scheduling Order with Dismissal of CFU’s Motion to Dismiss, and are still waiting for the decision on Iowa Utilities Board’s Motion to Dismiss, and here’s CFU stringing wire? Color me a Minnesotan in Iowa, but that seems pretty stupid to me.

Here is the view that Bert and Diane Schou saw today. How depressing and distressing…