“I said, ‘Take a look around, hang out as long as you want and see if you want to live here.’ ”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here’s the Bent Tree project – click for larger version:
Carol A. Overland, Overland Law Office — Utility Regulatory and Land Use Advocacy
Ah, yes, it’s that time of year again… remember this map, way back when, connecting existing coal plants to the proposed CapX 2020 system? (note the Mid-American coal plant built in 2007 over by Council Bluffs isn’t there, it’s at the green lines on the southwest side where transmission starts.)
It’s the Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing!
Here’s the full notice:
2017_Docket 17-18_Notice_201711-137509-01
And going back in history:
2006 Report to PUC – Docket 06-1733
2007 Report to PUC – Docket 07-1579
2008 Report to PUC – Docket 08-1426
2009 Report to PUC – Docket 09-1351
2010 Report to PUC – Docket 10-222
2011 Report to PUC – Docket 11-324
2012 Report to PUC – Docket 12-360
2013 Report to PUC – Docket 13-965
2014 Summary Report– Docket 14-887
2015 Summary Report – Docket 15-785
2016 Summary Report — Docket 16-18
Here’s the summary of what I had to say last year, from the report above:
Does this sound familiar?
Meanwhile, we’re still waiting on the rulemaking, 12-1246, which addresses PPSA siting rules, Minn. R. Ch. 7850. To see rulemaking docket, which ostensibly is to address the changes in the 2005 Transmission Omnibus Bill from Hell, go HERE and look up rulemaking docket 12-1246.
I expect this rulemaking to reach the Public Utilities Commission before I drop dead. But I’m starting to wonder. The “12” in “12-1246” means the docket was opened in 2012. This is 2017, almost 2018. Good grief!
Everybody, get out your HERC Hanky and wave it for the home team!!!
Last Thursday was a fairly short, but quite intense, day at the Public Utilities Commission. First up was Freeborn Wind (go here and search for docket 17-332), and its application for a transmission line for the project plus more. We did get the “proceeding” process and not a summary report. That’s good, not a huge deal, but enough that it means we get some extra process in the transmission routing docket, meaning an ALJ drafted Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (not just a report), and the opportunity to file Exceptions to the ALJ Recommendation. In those exceptions, we can also ask for public comment and oral argument to the Commission.
Second on the agenda was the HERC Power Purchase Agreement, and Xcel Energy’s HERC PPA Petition to cut the rate (go here and search for docket 17-532).
Bottom line, after much deliberation, and a 10 minute break (what is it they do back there???), here’s the decision option they chose, as framed in the Staff Briefing Papers_201711-137262-01:
Way to go, Mr. Alan Muller!
Seems to me that but for our squwaking, it would have eased on through. But the question remains, where were all the folks who supposedly had committed to shut down HERC?
Primary documents were posted earlier here:
Yes, Minnesota, impacts of wind turbines are real, and you’re going to have to deal with it.
“I want quiet and dark nights, not the noise and red flashing lights on top of wind towers,” she said. “We did not choose to live out here to be next to an industrial park.”
Here’s the proposal for Freeborn Wind with sound modeling (See Figure 6 Application, Siting_Initial Filng_Figures1-17_20176-132804-02), and consider, Minnesota standards for setbacks are that it much comply with MPCA noise standard PLUS 500 feet — the 500 feet is not built into this map (click for larger version):
Shadow flicker? Commerce admits in its Comments that there are homes affected beyond what is allowed by county ordinance (See Figure 8 Application, Siting_Initial Filng_Figures1-17_20176-132804-02) (click for larger version):
“I said, ‘Take a look around, hang out as long as you want and see if you want to live here.’ ”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here’s the Bent Tree project – click for larger version:
This Thursday, the Xcel Energy Petition to slash the Hennepin Energy Recovery Center Power Purchase Agreement. It’s a pretty twisted thing…
Read all about it — check out the Public Utilities Commission docket:
Click “Search Documents” HERE and search for docket 17-532
Here are the Staff Briefing Papers_201711-137262-01
For example, Commerce noted that the power wasn’t needed:
And the PUC staff seems to have heard this, which notes the capacity surplus in the Briefing Papers above:
Followed by this:
Ummmmmmmm, it’s both!
And it gets curiouser and curiouser… Again from the Briefing Papers:
And some validation of concerns raised:
So what will the Commission do? It seems their knickers are in a bunch and it’s not at all clear…
Here’s the Neighbors for Clean Air page for HERC:
And check out Alan Muller’s powerpoint from the successful challenge to attempt to increase garbage burning:
There was an announcement in April, 2016, of the “HERC Clean Power Plan Coalition” with multiple groups joining to shut down HERC! Sierra Club North Star Chapter, MPIRG, Neighborhoods Organizing for Change, Community Power, St. Joan of Arc, etc.
HERC? SHUT IT DOWN!
Electricity glut? It’s all over the U.S. It’s not just in MISO’s Midwest that there’s an energy glut, it’s also PJM, which is the market that Midwest electricity producers have their eyes on. PJM is TRANSMISSON and ELECTRIC MARKETING. And North American Electric Reliability Corporation, NERC, verifies it’s EVERYWHERE!
Just in, Monitoring Analytic’s 3rd Quarter report that includes the summer peak:
Here’s the bottom line, found on p. 120:
The PJM system real-time peak load in the first nine months of 2017 was
145,635.9 MW in the HE 1800 on July 19, 2017, which was 6,541 MW, or 4.3
percent, lower than the peak load in the first nine months of 2016, which was
152,176.9 MW in the HE 1600 on August 11 ,2016.
And just a few pages later, p. 123 (note losses are now treated differently, after they got onto the transmission build-out for export, shipping from any Point A to any Point B)(note also how MW exports incorporated into “Load plus Exports” has increased):
So while you’re mulling that over, consider the 2016 NERC Reliability Assessment:
This is the chart I’ve been trotting out for what, 19 years now? Reserve margins, showing that there’s plenty of electricity to go around (p. 44 of NERC Report above) (click for larger version):
Not only is MISO far ahead of what’s needed, even for reserve margins, but look at PJM here, more than twice what’s needed to cover reserve margins.
We can easily reduce coal generation NOW. What’s the hold up? Oh, right, marketing dreams… marketing dreams that we’re paying for, that transmission build-out that no one needs and no one wants, and their plans for even more! Planning meetings open only to a select few!