Legalectric

Here we go — Scoping meetings or environmental review for the “Mankato-Mississippi River” a/k/a Wilmarth-North Rochester-Tremval WI” transmission line. The application:

Another Xcel transmission application filed!

It’s yet another big honkin’ transmission line planned for southern Minnesota, some of which is along “alternate” routes for Capx 2020. CapX was to be the be-all and end-all of transmissison (well, so was Arrowhead), and here we are, too close to a virtual redo. Why? Where’s the need?

COMMENTS DUE AUGUST 1, 2024

NOTICE:

The schedule:

Of particular note, what does this do for Minnesota? Transmission, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR ME LATELY?

I’m representing NoCapX 2020 and The Prehn Family, because a part of a proposed route goes directly over the big CenterPoint natural gas dome just south of (flooded) Waterville. That little factoid, the location of the dome, locations of the many wells and monitoring stations, were NOT part of Xcel’s application. We did an inventory, and let them know with a rough map:

Xcel did have this to say in a Reply comment — it seems they did do some homework:

All the information in Xcel’s Reply, and more, needs to be in the environmental review and incorporated into not just environmental issues, but because this is both CoN (CN-22-532) and Routing (TL-23-157) dockets, the info must be part of the substantive side as well.

p.s. The Waterville school is flooded. Will post updated location when I get notice.

Still catching up — this extension for filing comments was issued on the 17th.

An earlier post:

Thursday’s Xcel IRP meeting at PUC October 8th, 2016

And another, with the IRP initial filings and how to get around in eDockets – there is a LOT that’s been filed:

Xcel’s new Integrated Resource Plan February 5th, 2024

“Steam Plant” my fat ass…

This just in — Notice from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) that the the Xcel garbage burner air permit is up for comment!

Comment period ends July 24, 2024

The documents are:

Public comment page: https://mpca.commentinput.com/?id=5GSCgR9YN

Public Notice: https://scs-public.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com/env_production/oid333/did200071/pid_209141/project-documents/Xcel%20PN.pdf

Draft Permit: https://scs-public.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com/env_production/oid333/did200071/pid_209141/project-documents/Xcel%20PERMIT.pdf

Technical Support Document: https://scs-public.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com/env_production/oid333/did200071/pid_209141/project-documents/Xcel TSD.pdf

From the Notice:

The public comment period is also the time to request an Informational Meeting and/or Contested Case, and the requirements are pretty specific:

Alan Muller on Red Wing incineration — from a while ago — and though the City’s incinerator has closed, the Xcel burner remains, covering us with Ramsey and Washington Counties’ garbage emissions:

Viewpoint: Truth re-evaluation of incineration long overdue

I came to Red Wing in 2007 with a background in incineration: Marketing incinerators, as a consultant to the engineering department of a large chemical company, and later opposing them, on health and economic grounds. It felt strange to live in a city that was itself in the garbage incineration business and seemed to care little about the impacts on the health and pocketbooks of residents.

I also found that if I went to a meeting in St. Paul related to garbage policy, in my consulting work, there would often be a Red Wing city official asking the Pollution Control Agency to force other communities to ship more garbage to Red Wing for burning.

Why? The municipal incinerator was losing a lot of money and city officials thought burning more garbage was the answer.

Costly decision

I don’t know what originally caused Red Wing to get into the garbage incineration business in the early 1980s. Even a rudimentary economic analysis should have shown this to be a bad idea. Perhaps it had something to do with the S.B Foot tannery as a steam customer.

In any case, Red Wing has tried ever since to get others to subsidize its poor judgment. For example, in 2006 Red Wing passed an ordinance requiring all the garbage collected in Red Wing to be hauled to the incinerator. This caused the intervention of the Institute for Justice, which noted: “The City of Red Wing, Minn., has unconstitutionally turned its local government into a special interest protected from competition.” https://ij.org/case/pauls-industrial-garage-and-gibson-sanitation-v-city… The city lost in federal court, but in 2007 a U.S. Supreme Court decision shifted the law somewhat in favor of Red Wing’s position. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1345.pdf

Red Wing officials have claimed that burning garbage supports “environmental goals.” This is not so. The basic chemistry of combustion tells us that every pound of garbage burned yields several pounds of ash, greenhouse gases, and health-damaging air pollutants. Red Wing officials’ real attitudes and values are revealed in this: The city burner had serious permit violations. Eventually, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency took enforcement action.

My file review indicated that the sole concern of the city, including council members, was weaseling out of paying fines. Concern about the possible harmful effects of excess emissions? None.

Speaking out

I began to send an occasional opinion piece to the Republican-Eagle on the unwisdom of all this. To the credit of Editor Anne Jacobson, almost all of these were printed. Whether they have had any impact is unclear.

Eventually the city incinerator became so decrepit it had to be shut down in 2013. This should have triggered a re-evaluation of Red Wing’s involvement in garbage burning, but it did not. Instead, the city transferred its affections to the Xcel Energy garbage burners on Fifth Street.

Xcel is one of the few utilities in the U.S. to be in the garbage-burning business, with burners in Red Wing, Mankato, nd La Crosse. These burners are the highest cost and most polluting of Xcel facilities.

In 2017 the main city garbage building, housing the dead city incinerator and other garbage operations, burned up. Why? Although fires in garbage piles are common, Public Works staff had shut down the fire alarms and didn’t maintain a human fire watch.

This negligence cost millions, and, again, should have triggered a re-evaluation of just why Red Wing is in the garbage business. Yet again, this did not happen.

Recently, the Public Works Department, in a report to the City Council, claimed as an accomplishment that Hastings’ garbage would be coming to Red Wing for burning. (“Secured delivery of MSW tonnages from City of Hastings beginning in 2019”) Just how this could benefit city residents is unstated, but benefit to residents does not seem to be a focus of the City Council.

Eleven years after I started to follow this, the city of Red Wing has apparently learned nothing. I think it must be related to a “Company Town” mentality of letting others do the thinking and decision-making. People don’t get more democracy, or better government, than they insist on, and Red Wing residents just don’t demand very much. It’s scary to think about the quality of information on environmental matters served up in Red Wing schools.

In fairness, the city of Red Wing isn’t the only offender here. The state of Minnesota through the Pollution Control Agency gives astoundingly bad guidance, and Goodhue County-counties are largely assigned responsibility for managing waste under state law-seems way behind the 8-ball. I will write another two episodes on state and county issues.

It’s long past time for people to wake up an assert themselves.

Alan Muller, Red Wing

Has everyone forgotten an earlier Integrated Resource Plan’s pledge to shut down Red Wing and Wilmarth garbage burning by 2012??

Breakfast on Xcel

May 14th, 2008

From this post, my firsthand report:

They had question answer time, and I asked that, given the new IRP says that “For capacity planning and RES compliance planning purposes, we rare assuming that Red Wing and Wilmarth will be retired at the end of 2012,” whether they’d be closing it or selling it. Oh my, gues who farted in the elevator again. They were backpeddling, oh, NO, it doesn’t say that… uh-huh, right… well, guys, take a look at p. 6-7 and the top of 6-8 and you tell me. They will provide the commission with an update in the next IRP. I look forward to seeing it and hope that this thing is out of my neighborhood. Once more with feeling:

For capacity planning and RES compliance planning purposes, we are assuming that Red Wing and Wilmarth will be retired at the end of 2012.

This sign is up at the Michigan intersection of M-28 and 123 on the way to Whitefish’s Great Lake Shipwreck Museum. Some yahoo sure picked the wrong scripture for reference!

Proverbs 6:16-19:

There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him:

17 haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,

18 a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil,

19 a false witness who pours out lies and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

For those of you wondering what David Boyd’s been up to since he was term-limited out of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, wonder no more. The rest of the story turned up in Grand Marais, Michigan, the other Grand Marais. I’d taken a photo much like this, but it’s disappeared, and found this nearly identical one — here ya go:

Turns out, the “David Boyd” boat is the R.V. David Boyd, the Great Lakes Shipwreck Museum’s “finder” of sunken ships:

So close, but no cigar!