SC5558-6 Last night in Rochester
January 16th, 2020
Last night, Sen. Osmek held a Senate Energy Committee meeting in Rochester. It was standing room only, at least 100 showed up (I had 100 flyers, and had 4 left and I know I missed a few).
Here’s the bill DRAFT, SC5558-6:
Here’s the powerpoint explaining the bill:
Who all showed up and testified? All a bunch of paid suits, with just three exceptions, pushed to the very end. Check the list of lobbyists here:
Alan Muller got on the list to testify, he’ll be writing to the Committee soon:
And here’s my comment sent to the committee:
Where were Senators Dibble and Marty? I must confess, I was so disgusted by Sen. Marty’s handling of the e21 debacle back in 2015 that I’ve not been back to the Senate Energy Committee since then (Marty tried to introduce Xcel’s e21 bill, and tried to shut down testimony opposing that bill…
(report from that meeting) though the room was packed with those who had rolled over supporting it, only three of us there opposed it, myself, Alan Muller, and Office of Attorney General’s RUD James Canneday. Sen. Marty pulled the bill as he “introduced” it and then substituted an e21 light and wouldn’t allow testimony on anything else! Well, we did what we could, and it wasn’t until the very end in conference committee or just before that he put the awful Xcel-desired language back in. SF 1735 – SHAME on each Senator who voted for it). Back into the fray, I guess!
My take is that Sen. Senjem, or the Republican caucus, or ???, are concerned about Sen. Senjem’s seat, why else would they put Mikey Bull up there beside him, emitting puffery about the bill? Seems there’s just one other Senate hearing scheduled, info below.
Next up, next week, Mound, Minnesota, in Sen. Ozmek’s district:
Wednesday, January 22, 2020, 4:00 PM
Mound Westonka High School’s Performing Arts Center
905 Sunnyfield Road East
Minnetrista, MN 55364
Now, Mikey, about “carbon capture and storage,” good grief. Did you learn nothing from all those years of Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Project? Here’s why it’s good the Mesaba Project was not built!
The 2019 Energy Ominous Bill
March 9th, 2019
Prairie Island Nuclear Plant & Prairie Island Indian Community
Here it is, I believe this is it, the “dream” bill that’s really a nightmare, Xcel Energy’s wish list, increasing “clean” energy generation, but what is regarded as clean, that’s the primary issue for me. For you? Check it out:
HF1956-0
OK, now, let’s read it and figure out what they’re up to!
And GO HERE to keep track of bill’s status.
House Energy Committee Hearings
Upcoming: Tuesday, March 12, 2019Energy and Climate Finance and Policy Division – Posted meeting schedule.
Here are the House Energy Committee members – contact all of them with your concerns!
There’s no Senate companion bill yet, and it’s getting late.
Xcel Energy’s 2017 peak demand – DOWN again
April 3rd, 2018
Once more with feeling, Xcel Energy’s peak demand is DOWN, DOWN, DOWN! From their year end SEC filing: Xcel Energy 2017 10-K
And over the last 17 years:
That 8,546 MW is down 1,313 from the 2006 peak. Xcel is now at legislature pushing hard for free rein on money to rehab its Prairie Island plant here in Red Wing. The same plant that was being rehabbed, got a Certificate of Need, and then they withdrew it saying it wasn’t needed. Oh… and now? It’s not adding up, folks.
FAKE NEWS again from CAE
December 15th, 2017
They’re recycling, and not in a good way. Why is the STrib facilitating this? Remember this from October?
Center of the American Experiment – Conflatulence!!
Here we go again, this time in the STrib:
The two primary false arguments:
1) Wind is driving up ratepayer cost (it’s not, it’s the return on capital expenditures).
2) Clean Power Plan and renewable mandates aren’t lowering CO2 and are driving up rates (CPP and mandates only increase “renewables” and don’t cut CO2 production, it’s a percentage change, and using least cost generation. Only reduction in burning will lower production of CO2).
3) High cost of electricity in Minnesota is connected to wind policies (When compared historically higher cost states like Illinois, yes, Minnesota’s rates are high, but it isn’t related to wind costs, wind is a least cost resource. It IS related to the shift of electricity from serving a franchise area to a market based system, and the market has spoken. When electricity can be sold for more, and where utilities have transmission build-out from any Point A to any Point B, they will sell to highest bidder. Higher priced markets will line up to buy our lower cost electricity and utilities will line up to sell it elsewhere rather than sell it for less to us, and we will have to pay the higher price to get electricity here. That’s how a market works, Econ 1001. With wholesale market deregulated, and transmission lines built, we’ve got defacto deregulation.).
And a minor but very obvious false statement:
And the shortfall in summer wind production is being backstopped primarily by coal-fired electricity.
Coal runs constantly, as does nuclear, well almost, capacity factor of 80+. But it’s natural gas, with its near-immediate ramping up that backs up wind, if generation is needed. DOH! Coal can’t get it up on command.
Why is the STrib printing this crap that is so patently false?
Here’s a good wallpaper to keep running, the MISO LMP map.
Check MISO’s real time LMP prices HERE!
See how Chicago area is cut out? That’s because it’s in PJM.
Check PJM’s real time LMP prices HERE!
Critical Infrastructure Month?
November 3rd, 2017
Did you know that November 2017 is Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience Month?
Proclamation – Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience Month_2017-24278
I find it unnerving when tRump says things like:
Our critical infrastructure also faces threats from capacity-induced strain, terrorist attacks, accidents, pandemics, space weather, and cyberattacks. To confront these diverse challenges systematically, we must take steps to enhance our Nation’s economic, intellectual, and technological leadership. My Administration will help our businesses invest in needed capital and research and development by reducing burdensome regulations and enacting comprehensive tax reform.
These aren’t exactly issues, it’s worked up hype. The language about “capacity-induced strain, terrorist attacks, accidents, pandemics, space weather, and cyberattacks” is a problem because there is not “capacity-induced strain,” and in fact, Xcel Energy whines that the grid is only 55% utilized, a point raised in its e21_Initiative_Phase_I_Report:
(N) Identify and develop opportunities to reduce customer costs by improving overall grid efficiency. In Minnesota, the total electric system utilization is approximately 55 percent (average demand divided by peak demand), thus providing an opportunity to reduce system costs by better utilizing existing system assets (e.g., generation, wires, etc.). (e21_Initiative_Phase_I_Report, p. 11).
There’s been one “terrorist attack” on infrastructure, the California substation:
Sniper attack on California power grid may have been ‘an insider’
Also note the phrase “capacity-induced strain,” which is all about market, but then again, we know that the market is the driver for this massive transmission buildout:
ICF – MISO Transmission Benefits Analysis
Who benefits? Utilities benefit big time. Those producing the glut of electricity that will be shipped from any Point A to any Point B; those building the transmission to ship it; and those providing transmission service. Who pays? Ratepayers and landowners and taxpayers (taxpayers? Yes, check the latest House bill for utility deductions for interest expenses and faster depreciation of expenses. And it came out in the last rate case that Xcel Energy hasn’t paid much in the way of taxes since 2008.
What will happen to this latest energy bill? We shall see…