PJM members set new record…
August 20th, 2011
A little birdie asked a question about need for Susquehanna-Roseland recently, and got me thinking. This PJM press release came out a while ago and I forgot to post it. It’s a legit PJM press release with an astonishing and crucial and decidedly “against interest” admission:
THEY ARE NOT USING DEMAND RESPONSE TO REDUCE LOAD!!!
Well, that makes business sense, they’re there to sell power, why refrain from selling it if they can! They’re also wanting to build more transmission, which they can’t do if they can’t prove need! And what better way to prove need than having a record peak demand? But we know what they’re doing… How many MW do they have in demand response, DSM, interruptibles, demand reduction by any name? How much lower would the peak demand be if they had used it as they should?
Here’s their press release:
And here’s that telling admission:
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
… once more with feeling…
Demand response was not called on to reduce load.
How dare they… and then to claim a “RECORD” peak demand…
Leave a Reply