12/9 – Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing
December 7th, 2025
It’s that time of year, the most wonderful time of the year…
BUT what does this mean? Now it’s the “annual hearing on the Energy Infrastructure Permitting Act.” Last legislative session there were so many changes, and one that I think has “unintended” consequences is that it is no longer the “Power Plant Siting Act,” originally Minn. Stat. ch. 116C, then 216E, and now 216I.
Here’s the notice:
Got that — it’s on Tuesday, at too early o’clock:
What’s the point? Well, I do ask myself that every year. Here’s what the Notice says:
I’ve been attending since ?? I think 1998, during Nuclear Waste Daze. Much has changed since then, particularly public participation — opportunities have been cut and application review has been shortened to make it “more efficient,” a la the multiple statements by Commissioners, “what can we do to make this faster”
Siting infrastructure is more important now than ever since the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission has abdicate “approval” authority to MISO, and that we’re looking at lattice-tower 765V transmission lines marching across Minnesota. All this transmission with a stagnant peak demand:
And remember this from Xcel’s 2022 SEC 10K filing, page 36:
But supposedly we “need” all this transmission? What’s the rate of return for this capital investment? And what do transmission owners collect for transmission service on these lines? There are two large revenue streams here:
As if Tranche 1 wasn’t enough?
Oh, but wait, before that, there were all those MVP projects, in Minnesota along the Iowa border:
And of course, CapX 2020, from the 2006 Certificate of Need application, not very colorful (and the Bemidji to Grand Rapids line was applied for separately):
Here’s a rough artist’s (!) perception of what all that looked like with the SW MN 345kV, CapX 2020, MVP Portfolio (in MN), and MISO’s Tranche 1 for a past Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing. I need to update and also check to make sure everything’s included:
Right now, here’s where we’re at. Trying to track this, much less catch up from a month in Norway, is a royal pain. There’s just too much:
If you’ve not read Paul Wellstone & Mike Casper’s “Powerline: The First Battle of America’s Energy War,” now’s a good time. You can usually find a copy at abebooks.com.
MISO, you’re giving miso a bad name:
Here are the Administrative Law Judge’s summary of comments — after this, it just goes into a black hole at the PUC. Here’s last year’s and then 23 more years:
- 2000 Summary of Proceedings
2000 Report EQB
2001 Summary of Proceedings
2001 Report EQB
2002 Summary of Proceedings
2002 Report to EQB
2003 Summary of Proceedings
2003 Report to EQB
2004 Summary of Proceedings
2004 Report to EQB
2005 Report to PUC
2006 Report to PUC – Docket 06-1733
2007 Report to PUC – Docket 07-1579
2008 Report to PUC – Docket 08-1426
2009 Report to PUC – Docket 09-1351
2010 Report to PUC – Docket 10-222
2011 Report to PUC – Docket 11-324
2012 Report to PUC – Docket 12-360
2013 Report to PUC – Docket 13-965
2014 Summary Report– Docket 14-887
2015 Summary Report – Docket 15-785
2016 Summary Report – Docket 16-18
2017 Summary Report – Docket 17-18
2018 Summary Report – Docket 18-18
2019 Summary Report_- Docket 19-18
2020 Summary Report – Docket 20-18
2021 Summary Report – Docket 21-18
2022 Summary-Report_- Docket 22-18
2023 Summary Report – Docket 23-18













Leave a Reply