PPSA Annual Hrg – TOMORROW!
December 19th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2015/11/mickeymouse.jpg)
And AGAIN! It’s the Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing! You can attend in person, MASKED, or via webex or phone. Primary documents are posted below.
December 20, 2021 @ 9:30
PUC Large Meeting Room
121 – 7th Place East – 3rd Floor
St. Paul, MN
Comments? BE SURE TO NOTE DOCKET NUMBER FOR COMMENTS:
PUC Docket E999/PR-21-18 & OAH Docket 65-2500-37832
Written comments will be accepted through January 10, 2022, by 4:30 p.m.
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/12/image-34.png)
Note notice only to those “who have requested notice” above? Nope, notice should be to all who are on service and project lists for projects active in the calendar year. Thankfully EERA does give notice to a lot more than just those “who have requested notice” (see “Notice & Service Lists” link posted above).
From the EQB Monitor:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/12/image-33.png)
Here are the projects EERA’s Summary says were approved — note that for wind it does NOT list applicable parts of 216E, such as Minn. Stat. 216E.03, Subd. 7!
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/12/image-35.png)
Meanwhile, the update of rules for PPSA siting, Minn. R. ch. 7850, is stalled out again, WITHDRAWN by the PUC last Thursday, supposedly based on many comments made over the last few weeks by a bunch of people and orgs who were utterly absent through the NINE YEARS of this rulemaking proceeding. My grits are FRIED! The PUC Agenda Item starts at the very end of the meeting, and note the bogus statements about the “why” of this rulemaking. Let’s be clear here — it’s due to the 2005 legislative changes, SIXTEEN YEARS AGO. See PUC Docket R-12-1246. Good grief… Discussion starts at 2:48:28:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2011/10/manurespreader2.jpg)
2021 Biennial Xmsn Projects Report
November 2nd, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/11/image-7.png)
It’s that time of the year, errrrrr, it’s that time of every other year… time for the Minnesota Transmission Owners:
It’s filed in Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Docket M-21-111.
The Biennial Transmission Projects Report is required by statute, but there are no longer public meetings, and I must admit, I had pushed and promoted a lot initially, but ran out of time and energy for such a … ahem… waste of time. See Minn. Stat. §216B.2425 for how it’s supposed to go.
If history is any guide, it seems Initial Comments are about a month and a half out, mid-January, with Reply Comments another month and a half out, so mid-March. I’ll put it on the calendar and send a reminder around.
There’s nothing really exciting that I see, at first glance, but I did enjoy seeing the NERC Report excerpts. Last time they included the NERC Reliability as a separate filing, this time they included excerpts at the tail end of the report, above.
Here’s the full NERC Report — it comes out every year, and has a great assortment of important info, about reliability margins, load forecasts, and predictions of generation mix for energy and peak demand. I LOVE THE NERC REPORT!! Here’s the most recent ones — they used to come out in October, now it’s December:
NERC 2020 Long-Term Reliability Assessment
This is how reliability was defined in the transmission world decades ago, circa 1999 NERC Long-Term Reliability Assessment:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/11/image-10-1024x223.png)
Keep in mind that now transmission is no longer about reliability — it’s about economics, so it’s a very different type of evaluation.
Who cares about the NERC Report? Over the decades, the NERC reports have looked at the various areas of the country, based on the grid’s organization, and it evaluates the system’s ability to provide electricity. What I like about it, though, is that the charts, graphs, circles, and arrows belie the party line, like all the talk about decreasing coal and fossil fuel generation, but look at projections for MISO:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/11/image-8.png)
Here’s the chart for MISO — the devil is in the details — look at the predominance of fossil fuel:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/11/image-9.png)
Remember how the utilities were blathering about the NEED for transmission, and that the transmission build-out would decrease need and reliance on reserve margin — at that time, MISO reserve margin was 15%.
They got their billions in transmission and we’re paying them way too much for it, and look at the reserve margin, the last line in that chart:
18%
Oh, well… I must have misunderstood… SNORT!
And yeah, the purpose of that big transmission build-out morphed into “IT’S FOR WIND!” yet remember, the CapX 2020 lines start at the coal plants and head east:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2014/06/CapX.jpg)
And the MISO MVP 17 Portfolio of projects supporting coal:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2020/01/MVP-portfolio-map.jpg)
It’s exhausting, dizzying, seeing these scams spinning through, and yet here we go with “Grid North Partners.” Just NO!
Again, there will be opportunity for Initial and Reply Comments, expect Notice in a couple weeks, with Initial Comments probably due in mid-January. So later… in the meantime, look at the NERC report and compare with all the blather you’re hearing, particularly with COP26 in the works.
RULES! PUC’s 7849 & 7850
October 12th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2011/12/screamhomer.jpg)
Can it be?!?! The rulemaking based on the 2005 statutory changes was published in the state register today. TODAY… 2005… SIXTEEN YEARS, and NINE YEARS since this 12-1246 docket was opened. Comments are due by November 17, more on that below.
The Public Utilities Commission did one hell of a job delaying until BILLIONS of CapX 2020, a/k/a CapX 2050 and Grid North Partners and MTEP MVP projects were rammed through. Public interest anyone? Naaaaaaah…
Here it is — First the Notice (60 page service list!), then Statement of Need and Reasonableness (SONAR) and then the proposed rules (yeah, 120+ pages):
Comments are due November 17th:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/10/image-13.png)
Here’s the catch — they are planning on putting these through without a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, UNLESS there are at least 25 requests for a hearing — I think that can be arranged. Here are the details, note that they must be “valid” requests, which means explain in short what you want differently in the rules:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/10/image-14.png)
ONWARD! SIXTEEN YEARS… UNREAL!
Collective goals? REGULATORY CAPTURE!
June 2nd, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/06/image-2.png)
Here we go again. It’s bad enough that CapX 2020 is morphing into CapX 2050/Grid North Partners, but they’re having a “conference” (sign up here) in a couple weeks.
Look at the Chair of this panel, none other than the Chair of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, and the description:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/06/image-3-1024x346.png)
… TO MEET OUR COLLECTIVE GOALS?
Remember the toadying for CapX 2020? Remember the toadying for Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Project coal gasification? Remember the toadying for Prairie Island/NSP/Xcel Energy’s nuclear plants, particularly Prairie Island circa 1994 and 2003?
This sort of thing has been an issue before, and former Chair LeRoy Koppendrayer has been the only one to acknowledge this type of participation as an issue — this was in 2007:
IEDC gets carried away
When this happens, I contact the PUC and register concerns, and have always been assured that they know well the boundaries.
And, well, here’s Commissioner Tuma on DOE Nuclear Waste panel circa 2016:
DOE “Consent-Based” Nuclear Waste Mtg.
![20160721_172836[1]](https://legalectric.org/f/2016/07/20160721_1728361.jpg)
This was also an issue with Commissioner Reha when she went off on a coal gasification junket to Belgium and promotion of CapX 2020! See the John Tuma link, above, for this with active links:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/06/image-4.png)
When the promotion and bias is so blatant, I’m not about to watch silently. Earth to PUC Commissioners, here are the PUC’s rules:
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/7845.0400/
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/7845.0700/
And when you see something, say something?
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/06/image-5-1024x416.png)
Ummmm, right…
ALJ “INVESTIGATIVE REPORT PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. § 216A.037”
Listen to Commissioner Tuma’s words that were the subject of our complaint at the link above. And the ALJ’s report delivers this warning:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/06/image-6.png)
I guess it will be an informal complaint, eh?
Walleye Neighbors’ comments on draft permit
May 20th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/05/image-42.png)
Just filed… Walleye Neighbors in Minnesota and South Dakota Comments on the Walleye Wind Draft Site Permit. Now it’s time for a nap!