Legalectric

And North East Independent School District, a school district in San Antonio, is reviewing their books. That school district, FYI, has a section in school library where parental permission is necessary to check out books? WTAF?

CLICK HERE FOR THE LIST!

From the North East Independent School District website: “Feel free to email us at board@neisd.net. We welcome your comments, questions, or concerns.”

board@neisd.net

Have at it, let them know what you think.

A Texas school district is reviewing 400 library books after a GOP lawmaker’s inquiry

From the article:

“If a book needs to be moved from elementary to the secondary level or whether a book at the high school level needs to be placed in a separate section that requires parental permission,” she wrote.

“The idea is more of a reorganization and a reshuffle — the purpose is not to remove books.”

And on Krause’s effort:

But the Democratic vice chair of the panel says the inquiry is a waste of taxpayers’ money and educators’ time. State Rep. Victoria Neave says it’s an attempt to obscure facts and exploit a wedge issue for political gain.

And this:

Texas school district pulls 400 books from library shelves for review after legislator’s inquiry

Here we go again. I thought I’d posted this, but on the road, so much to do that I forgot! SO, here it is, the DOE’s “Notice of Request for Information (RFI) on Using a Consent-Based Siting Process to Identify Federal Interim Storage Facilities.”

Here’s the PDF:

Comments are due by March 4, 2022 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. They’re looking for answers to these questions, and yes, this IS an essay test. Take some time to work through and write some cogent answers:

We had a round of this four years ago, here are a couple Legalectric posts:

“Consent-based” nuclear waste siting? July 13th, 2016

DOE “Consent-Based” Nuclear Waste Mtg. July 22nd, 2016

And my comment then:

Get to work. Four months until comments are due — easy peasy!

Thanks to John Blair & Valley Watch for this: