Dale Rohlfing, D.C., drums up some good news!
July 28th, 2011
Wind projects aren’t benign, to birds, or to humans…
July 25th, 2011
The importance of siting properly — maybe the message is getting through? Just like a nuclear plant, you can’t be putting generators in the ground without a lot of respectful planning and consideration for neighbors, be they the people living next door or the migratory birds making their way through, or in their foraging, roosting and nesting territory.
Eagles are as much an issue here as with the CapX 2020 Brookings transmission line crossing of the Minnesota River, and will be an issue with any of the proposed crossings for the CapX 2020 transmission line across the Mississippi River, which is North America’s major migratory flight path. Eagles in the proximity of transmission lines was the reason (arguably, because the real reason was that they couldn’t use the Myrick Road route, but that’s a whole ‘nother post, see www.nocapx2020.info and search for “Myrick”).
When you’re planning utility infrastructure, and permitting it, you’ve got to have concerns for impacts, but when it’s no
longer the “Environmental Quality Board” handling it, and it’s the Dept. of COMMERCE with their COMMERCE charge, humans and eagles don’t have a chance against the corporate promoters of these projects. It’s time to transfer review back to the Environmental Quality Board and develop standards for siting (do you know there are NO standards for
siting wind projects over 25MW? They just do it on a case by case basis, with no scientific basis whatsoever), and eliminate the Dept. of Commerce and their corporate shills from any oversight of utility projects, unless they want to intervene as a party.
Yesterday there were two articles on this, in the STrib and the LA Times:
Bald eagles could thwart Red Wing wind farm
Wind farms multiply, fueling clashes with nearby residents
Here are the full articles so they’ll be around once archived. First from the STrib:
Bald eagles could thwart Red Wing wind farm
* Article by: JOSEPHINE MARCOTTY , Star Tribune
* Updated: July 25, 2011 – 1:57 AMIn battle against a Red Wing project, citizens turn to a national symbol.
But there is no certainty such a plan will succeed in protecting eagles or other endangered species.
But that’s only if the deaths are discovered.
“If there are 50 birds hit, are they going to tell anyone?” he said. “We hope they would.”
And in the L.A. Times:
Wind farms multiply, fueling clashes with nearby residents
By Tiffany Hsu, Los Angeles Times
Reporting from Tehachapi, Calif.—
Tehachapi activist Terry Warsaw said he’s worried his community will soon be surrounded by turbines.
“They are not benign things,” she said. “We’ve seen turbines go berserk.”
“Monstrous insects,” she calls them. “I look at the propellers for a moment and my head gets dizzy.”
“We are resembling hundreds of towns around the country,” she said.
Some suggest that removing trees to make way for the machines could lead to erosion and flooding.
NPS pressured about Susquehanna-Roseland EIS
July 21st, 2011
First, the bad news – the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has affirmed the Order of the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission approving the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project:
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania – Affirms Pennsylvania’s S-R Order
And now, on to the pressure… The National Park Service is working to do it’s job as steward of our national park land, in this case, the federally declared Wild and Scenic Delaware River and the Delaware Water Gap.
Seems that some don’t think they should be allowed to do that job, and are pressuring them to “hurry up” so the Susquehanna-Roseland transmission line can steamroll on through. Well, BACK OFF!
Today the pressure on NPS was overt in two venues. First, U.S. Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA) amends a bill to push the NPS to complete its environmental review one year ahead of schedule. Say what?!?!?!
Then in my inbox a sour grapes press release from FERC Commissioner Phillip Moeller whining because the newly adopted rule won’t do what he wants, it won’t address “problems” like NPS doing its proper review of transmission projects:
Here’s the Susquehanna-Roseland specific part:
“While I offer substantial praise for today’s final rule, the Commission should have taken a different approach to several important issues. We must recognize that all of the nation’s difficulties in building needed transmission will not be resolved by this rule. Rather, this rule largely addresses planning for long-distance transmission lines, which is only a subset of the critical issues that are inhibiting needed investment.
This rule cannot address issues like the delays caused by other federal agencies in the siting of important projects, as this Commission lacks the legal authority to require other federal agencies to act. For example, see the comments of PJM in this proceeding at p. 17, which state that:
[t]he PJM Board approved the Susquehanna-Roseland 500 kV line in 2007. The Susquehanna-Roseland line was approved by the state regulatory commissions in Pennsylvania and New Jersey for 2012. The line is currently delayed by the National Parks Service [sic] and is not expected to be in service until 2014 at the earliest.
Ohhhhhhhh, isn’t it too bad. He’s just one Commissioner, and he’s got to put his dissent out there as an extensive and extended rulemaking proceeding closes… Why is he pushing, why does he care, and why does his care rise to the level that he sends out a dissenting press release? Lighten up, the National Park Service has a job to do. As the testimony in the Susquehanna-Roseland proceeding before the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities reflects, we are NOT going to freeze in the dark in an incubator without a job…
And here’s Pre. Charlie Dent’s whine:
Charlie Dent pushes expedited federal review of Susquehanna-Roseland power line proposal
Published: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 4:30 AM
By Tom Rowan Jr. | The Express-TimesAnd the New Jersey Sierra Club wants Dent, R-Lehigh Valley, to back off.
If it passes through the House, it would be referred to the Senate.
LIARS – 9,504 MW is NOT record peak demand for Xcel
July 19th, 2011
Read the STrib today? Xcel has 9,500 record peak.
Xcel, how dare you… the 9,500MW peak you report is exaggerated… naughty, naughty. You didn’t deduct for the interruptible service customers’ megawatts, and you’re including electricity you’ve generated and sold elsewhere, that the number represents the totals Xcel put on the grid, and not accounting for the demand that they’ve shed, not wholesale sales in other markets. THIS IS NOT PEAK DEMAND!!! YOU’RE CHEATING, XCEL… sigh… what’s new…
Thanks for clearing that up, little birdie!
But even considering that sleight of hand, it’s no record, it’s not even up to the 2006 peak… and that was FIVE years ago. Your CapX 2020 transmission is predicated on 2.43% (is that right, 2.4 something…) increase annually, but folks, we’re not even close to that.
Here’s the peak demand over the last 10 years:
And here’s what the STrib said today, what they said that Xcel said, blah blah blah, 9,500 my ass:
Bent Tree Wind Farm Sound Levels
July 14th, 2011
From Albert Lea Tribune, Fair Use, capturing one of those classic “oh shit…” moments in trucking… (see article below).
In another “oh shit” moment, the Bent Tree Wind Farm noise testing report is out, was released about a month ago, and I’m finally getting around to publishing it.
Bent Tree – Survey of Operational Sound Levels
Take a look at p. 19 and 20 for L10 and L50 levels, and look how frequently the levels are higher state noise limits! See Minn. Rule 7030.0040:
Here’s a summary chart from the Bent Tree noise report, p. 13:
And what they’re trying to do is to remove background sound so that the numbers won’t be above what is allowed by the state’s rules. Graphically, here’s what that comparison, with and without background noise, looks like, p. 43:
The article that was the source of the photo at the top is from the Albert Lea Tribune, and it’s old news, from Sept. 2010, but for those inquiring minds that want to know:
Wind turbine tower falls off truck
Published 9:43am Thursday, September 16, 2010
MANCHESTER — A section of a Vestas wind turbine tower slipped off the semi that was hauling it early Thursday morning.
The truck was carrying the large tower section on gravel 695th Avenue north of Freeborn County Road 29 near West Freeborn Lutheran Church. It fell off near a turn in the road.
The gravel roads in southern Minnesota were saturated after heavy rains Wednesday night. Albert Lea received more than an inch on Wednesday.
Fortunately for the construction workers, the ditch along 695th Avenue was shallow compared to most. It is a minimal traffic road.
Trucks have been delivering these large pieces to each site in the Bent Tree Wind Farm since July.
The Freeborn County Sheriff’s Office responded to the incident. The call went out around 7 a.m. Sheriff Mark Harig said as far as he knew there were no injuries or damages reported.
“It’s just blocking the road,” Harig said.
He said as of 8 a.m. a deputy was still near the site performing traffic control.
“They’ll have to get a crane to pick it up and move it where it needs to go,” Harig said.