AFCL’s Motion to Remand to ALJ filed today
February 14th, 2019

Friday, Freeborn Wind is before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, where Association of Freeborn County Landowners’ Motions for Reconsideration are on the agenda:
UPDATE:
Why update? Because we got more juicy details. As I was filing the “Motion to Remand to ALJ” I got an email from Commerce-EERA’s John Wachtler, and he said that there were no emails, that Commerce deletes them after 90 days. Well, emails weren’t all that was requested, and yet, NOTHING was produced. NOTHING!
Here’s what we asked for:
Why am I not surprised…
What MISO says about low wind generation in extreme cold
February 9th, 2019

There’s been a lot of speculation about the low wind production during the low-low temps at the end of January. Turns out there’s an issue not anticipated by MISO that they’re going to have to deal with. I heard it first from a little birdie who heard it while in a flock…

And now from a bigger birdie with primary info from the horse itself: Turbines apparently have a -22F degree or so automatic shutoff, so when it was way cold, they shut off.
Unidentified temperature cutoff thresholds challenged
wind forecasting in morning of Jan 30. Unexpected
shutoffs led to a large deviation from planned output.
Ummmmm, that’s a problem. Here’s the MISO update on that:
And from my “good friends” at Center of the American Experiment, who got it twisted again:
Twisted? What’s wrong with that? Well, their focus is that it was an intermittency issue, which it was not. As above, it was that shut-off at -22! And note the part in their post about “unforeseen.” And THAT is the problem, because the -22 cut-off was not integrated into the MISO modeling, plans, and that was a surprise, and they’re going to have to figure that one out. It’s possible, probable, and now apparently likely that we will have another -22 degree spell in the foreseeable future. So get with it, MISO!
And natural gas. I keep thinking about that CenterPoint natural gas underground storage dome. 7 billion cubic feet at least. There’s a lot of gas in storage. Are they relying on pipelines, and does that reliance take into account the many newer natural gas plants? Does Xcel share/buy from CenterPoint, take advantage of the storage? What is the impact of so many electric generators fueled by natural gas? They did recently do a lot of natural gas pipeline work on that primary north/south line running north from Waseca, was that a capacity expansion… upgrades or maintenance ??

Tony Evers PSC Chair appointment?!?!?
December 22nd, 2018


From her Quarles bio:
-
Successfully obtained regulatory approval for a 90-turbine, 162-megawatt wind energy project
-
Successfully obtained regulatory approval for an 88-turbine, 145-megawatt wind energy project
-
Representation of public utilities in all aspects of general and special-purpose rate cases
-
-
Negotiation of multiple renewable energy power purchase agreements
Hoar Frost over Shell Rock River
December 10th, 2018

This is the Shell Rock River, covered with winter hoar frost today, and part of the DNR’s Shell Rock River State Water Trail, where Freeborn Wind wants to string a transmission line over the river! Click for larger view:

It’s a State Water Trail – click for larger view:


Doesn’t this just look like the greatest place for transmission across the river?!?! Good grief, what are they thinking?


PUC denies Reconsideration re: Wind Rulemaking
December 6th, 2018

We know who you are, and we saw what you did… and didn’t!
No surprise. Today the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission rejected Goodhue Wind Truth’s Petition for Reconsideration of the Commission’s denial of our Petition for Rulemaking. Rules, who needs rules… about 2,500 MW of wind has been sited in Minnesota WITHOUT LARGE WIND SPECIFIC SITING RULES AND/OR STANDARDS! Really! And the Commission doesn’t seem to regard that as a problem. Large wind is sited using SMALL WIND/COUNTY SITING STANDARDS, not intended for large wind. And the Commission doesn’t seem to regard that as a problem. Large wind is sited using MPCA’s industrial noise standards which were admittedly NOT designed with wind in mind. And the Commission doesn’t seem to regard that as a problem. Large wind is sited using a Commerce boilerplate site permit with 1,000 foot setbacks and staff has no idea where that 1,000 foot setback came from (it’s contrary to even the small wind standards, and there’s no rule or standard of 1,000 ft!). And the Commission doesn’t seem to regard that as a problem.
Here’s the rest of the background information:
GWT Rulemaking Reconsideration is 12/6
November 21st, 2018
Wind Rulemaking — Petition for Reconsideration
October 16th, 2018
Today’s Wind Rulemaking Comments
August 24th, 2018
Notice – PUC wants wind rulemaking comments!
August 2nd, 2018
Just filed – Petition for Wind Siting Rulemaking
July 30th, 2018