Red Wing Mayor Egan exposed
February 6th, 2013
Red Wing’s Mayor Dennis Egan is in pretty deep, and it’s getting deeper. The Red Wing City Council will address the discovery that he’s a frac sand toady at the Monday City Council meeting. That’s good to hear. And they need to hear from those of us who are appalled at his duplicity.
URGENT – TODAY – contact the Red Wing City Council members and forward this Red Wing City Council contact info to friends, neighbors and family in Red Wing.
sebion3@gmail.com, lisa.bayley@ci.red-wing.mn.us, deanhove@charter.net, michael.v.schultz@charter.net, peggy.rehder@ci.red-wing.mn.us, ralph.rauterkus@ci.red-wing.mn.us, marilyn.meinke@ci.red-wing.mn.us
And don’t forget to copy: dennis.egan@ci.red-wing.mn.us, kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Red Wing Mayor to represent silica sand industry
Sand storm heads toward Capitol
Mayor Egan – the voice of frac sand mining!
Red Wing Mayor Egan leads Minnesota Industrial Sand Council; citizens wonder who he’ll serve
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In the STrib today:
Red Wing’s mayor gets second job with frac sand lobbying group
(I liked the first headline better: “Red Wing’s mayor signs on with frac sand lobby”)
His work to promote fracking is a conflict of interest, residents say.
Bayley said the council will discuss the matter Monday at a regularly scheduled meeting.
Kuhlmann did not return a phone call Tuesday afternoon.
“In my mind, there’s not a conflict,” Egan said.
“The issue of local control is very important to us,” Rehder said.
“Would I ever be a lobbyist and hold public office at the same time?” Rehder said. “No.”
And in the Rochester Post Bulletin:
Red Wing mayor to represent silica sand industry
The peculiar situation has riled some.
Egan, who took office in 2011 and was re-elected in 2012, signed a contract Friday that installs him as executive director of the newly formed Minnesota Industrial Sand Council. The council is an organization of six Minnesota companies with an interest in mining silica sand, including the owner of a proposed St. Charles development, with Egan at its head. The council also represents the interests of companies involved in silica mining in an ancillary way, such as railroads, trucking and petroleum producers.
“The folks had gotten my name because that’s what I do,” said Egan, who has worked the last 10 years as a Capitol lobbyist. “It wasn’t tied to anything other than ‘Dennis, you’ve done this for 10 years and you have a good reputation.’ My approach is you need to work in collaboration to move projects forward.”
The new group has hired Minneapolis-based Larkin Hoffman law firm to serve as its lobbyist during the current legislative session, where Sen. Matt Schmitt, DFL-Red Wing, is expected to propose silica sand legislation later this week. Egan hopes to develop a list of best practices related to dust mitigation and other mining issues.
Southeastern Minnesota is at the forefront of the state’s silica sand controversy. The issue first surfaced just a few miles from Red Wing when Windsor Permian, an Oklahoma-based energy company, purchased 155 acres of land in 2010 and expressed an interest in mining silica sand. Concerns spread rapidly through the region since then, with Winona, St. Charles and Wabasha being the current hot spots.
There are just five active silica sand mines in the state, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, but many new ones have been proposed. Demand for the hard, round sand has exploded due to advances in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, to extract oil and natural gas, particularly in North Dakota.
Egan, who has previously served as the Chamber of Commerce President in Red Wing and Rochester, said that he’s been brought in to resolve controversial situations in St. Louis and Ramsey counties, among others, in prior business deals. He’s since created his own company called Egan Public Affairs, which specializes in such endeavors.
“It’s another project in which you find passions on both sides of the aisle,” Egan said of his new role. “I don’t want to come across as downplaying that for southeast Minnesota. It’s a big issue; I recognize that.”
However, some aren’t convinced Egan’s new role is proper given his status as an elected official. Carol Overland, a Red Wing attorney, e-mailed the city council raising concerns about a conflict of interest and her concerns don’t appear to have fallen on deaf ears. Though council president Lisa Bayley declined comment and others didn’t return calls, council member Peggy Rehder expressed frustration that she wasn’t directly informed of Egan’s plans; the news was first posted online Friday evening by “Politics in Minnesota.”
Egan said he informed Red Wing City Administrator Kay Kuhlmann of the job offer prior to accepting; Kuhlmann was not available for comment.
“I’m puzzled,” Rehder said. “I think we need more information and we need a legal opinion from the city attorney.
“You’re absolutely right that people are concerned.”
While the situation is expected to be discussed further at Monday’s city council meeting, members of the citizen’s opposition group Save The Bluffs see it as a clear conflict of interest.
“How can you represent citizens and the industry at the same time?” asked John Tittle, a Red Wing resident and Bluffs member. “It seems like it would be a conflict. It seems kind of obvious.”
Egan responded to those challenges by saying the city ordinance had been approved for months by the time the sand companies approached him in late December. Should any new proposals be made, the mayor says he’d recuse himself from those discussions.
Mayor Egan – the voice of frac sand mining!
February 5th, 2013
Red Wing’s Mayor, Dennis Egan, is the voice of frac sand mining. Yes, it’s true, and here is his email so you can tell him what you think: dennis.egan@ci.red-wing.mn.us
What’s the big deal? Well, it’s a simple matter of whose interests the mayor represents. It’s about ethics. The Mayor’s job is to public represent the City of Red Wing, the “titular head” of the city. Can he spell C-O-N-F-L-I-C-T?
The City of Red Wing recently spent a year addressing frac sand in the City, first enacting a Silica Sand Moratorium and then an Ordinance. This remains a major issue at Goodhue County, and in the entire state of Minnesota.
It appears that organizing his “Red Wing 2020,” an “Advisory Committee to the Mayor” and having this “Advisory Committee to the Mayor” host a frac sand mining promotional love fest wasn’t enough, nooooooooo, now he’s officially, publicly, and professionally promoting frac sand interests, and he’s being paid for it. While he’s Mayor of Red Wing? Can you believe it?
A recent Politics in Minnesota article laid it out, that he’s “Executive Director” of the Minnesota Industrial Sand Council, which is a lobbying group to promote frac sand mining and associated interests. Here’s the scoop that relates to Mayor Egan:
FYI, Mayor Dennis Egan’s facebook pages says he “lives in St. Paul.” Curiouser and curiouser!
SF 183! Call or email Senate Judiciary today!
January 31st, 2013
Sen. Kevin Dahle has introduced SF 183, a bill that addresses the problems landowners are encountering with our good friends at Xcel Energy when they attempt to elect the “Buy the Farm” option. See Minn. Stat. 216E.12, Subd. 4. Buy the Farm gives landowners the option of requiring condemnation of their entire parcel, which means they can get out from under the transmission line. Xcel Energy, on the other hand, is doing everything it can to prevent landowners from electing Buy the Farm (click here for prior “Buy the Farm” posts).
I’d guess that Rep. David Bly will introduce this on the House side. Keep your eyes open.
Next steps – first email Sen. Kevin Dahle with a BIG thank you! sen.kevin.dahle@senate.mn
Then send emails and call the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it’s been sent for its first committee hearing — there’s only 8 members so it won’t take long:
Then contact your own state Senator and Representative and let them know SF 183 Buy the Farm needs their support.
Will keep you posted on other Buy the Farm developments. This bill is a good start to the 2013 session!
DNR Rulemaking on Endangered species
January 28th, 2013
Photo from Red Wing Visitor and Convention Bureau – for more, go HERE!
Beginning TOMORROW, the DNR is hosting a series of hearing on rulemaking to amend Rules Relating to Engangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species, Minn. R. 6134.0170, 6134.0200, 6134.0300, and 6134.0400.
One by one, the rules at issue per the DNR:
Minn. R. 6134.0170 (DOES NOT EXIST?!?!)
The hearings are beginning tomorrow evening in Rochester:
Yes, bald eagles are on this list, as are loggerhead shrike and trumpeter swans, all at issue in the Goodhue Wind project. It seems to me that Golden Eagles ought to be acknowledged and added, they’ve been sighted in the area as well, and no take permits are allowed by USFWS.
CLICK HERE for some comments they received recently.
PUC Rules Comments due Tomorrow
January 23rd, 2013
Comments due TOMORROW!!! If you want to be a part of the Rulemaking Advisory Committee, this is the time to let them know that you want to be included. After you’ve written your comments, file in PUC Docket 12-1246 or email to: kate.kahlert@state.mn.us
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission has opened a docket for… get this:
Possible Amendments to Rules Governing Certificates of Need and Site and Route Permits for Large Electric Power Plants and High-Voltage Transmission Lines, Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7849 and 7850; and to Rules Governing Notice Plan Requirements for High-Voltage Transmission Lines, Minnesota Rules, part 7829.2550; Revisor’s ID Number R-04151; PUC Docket No. E,ET,IP-999/R-12-1246.
This is similar to the OAH “Possible” rulemaking, where they’re on a fishing expedition, for what I have not a clue, whether it’s to get ideas, or find out what not to include or identify the usual suspects, very hard to tell, and I couldn’t get any information out of Bret Eknes at the PPSA Annual Hearing. The notice states “The Commission has not yet drafted the possible rule amendments.”
Here’s the notice — note they do say that part of this is to “maximize citizen participation” so let’s hold them to it:
Request for Comments – “Possible” Amendments to Rules PUC Docket 12-1246
Possible? Ummmmm, right… well, it’s about time. Here’s the PUC’s Rulemaking site (you can also go to eDockets, search for 12-1246):
I’d put in a rulemaking Petition two years ago tomorrow…
Overland Petition 2010 PPSA Annual Hearing, filed January 2011
…and they said they wanted it broken down. OK, sure, whatever, so I did. Thus far I’ve filed the OAH ones, and haven’t gotten around to doing that yet. SO, got to work today and ground out these comments based on the previously filed ones, you can use these for ideas, steal away!
NoCapX & U-CAN Comments – Jan 23, 2013
Once more with feeling, they’re due tomorrow.