Shale Gas bubble about to burst?
February 22nd, 2013
Big thanks to Common Dreams and DeSmog Blog for getting word about these two reports:
Drill, Baby, Drill: Can Unconventional Fuels Usher in a New Era of Energy Abundance?
Shale and Wall Street: Was the Decline in Natural Gas Prices Orchestrated?
What are we getting into? Lots of drilling, lots of fracking, plus lots of frac sand mines already running in Wisconsin and a few mines and many mining proposals here in Minnesota… I’ve seen the problems with contamination of wells from fracking, and with earthquakes in Ohio from injection of fracking waste water. From here, it seems likely that the destruction will catch up with the gas extractors and it will all blow up.
But in addition to the no-longer-possible-to-ignore physical problems of water contamination, earthquakes, and empoundment failures, there are economic problems too. Electrical costs follow natural gas prices, and I’ve been watching this for a while, as gas prices drop, as electric prices drop into the toilet, i.e., Electric Monthly Update (next one due out Feb. 25, 2013). It’s not just decreased demand sinking the electrical prices, there’s the impact of natural gas prices due to overproduction.
Now two reports have come out that you should put on your “MUST READ” list:
Drill, Baby, Drill: Can Unconventional Fuels Usher in a New Era of Energy Abundance?
And another:
Shale and Wall Street: Was the Decline in Natural Gas Prices Orchestrated?
This is important stuff — particularly if, indeed, it’s a bubble about to burst. From this spot on the planet, it’s hard to imagine otherwise.
The “Key Takeaways” of Drill, Baby, Drill: Can Unconventional Fuels Usher in a New Era of Energy Abundance? (really, that’s how the author put it… “Key Takeaways”… editor, anyone?):
KEY TAKEAWAYS
- World energy consumption has tripled in the past 45 years, and has grown 50-fold since the adventof fossil oil a century and a half ago. More than 80 percent of current energy consumption isobtained from fossil fuels.
- Per capita energy consumption is highly inequitably distributed. Developed nations like the United States consume four times the world average. Aspirations of growth in consumption by the nearly 80 percent of the world’s population that lives with less than the current per capita world average will cause unprecedented strains on the world’s future energy system.
- Oil is of particular concern given the geopolitical implications of the concentration of exporters in the Middle East, Russia and West Africa and the dependency of most of the developed world on imports.
- In the next 24 years world consumption is forecast to grow by a further 44 percent—and U.S. consumption a further 7 percent—with fossil fuels continuing to provide around 80 percent of total demand. Fuelling this growth will require the equivalent of 71 percent of all fossil fuels consumed since 1850— in just 24 years.
- Recent growth notwithstanding, overall U.S. oil and gas production has long been subject to the law of diminishing returns. Since peak oil production in 1970, the number of operating oil wells in the U.S. has stayed roughly the same while the average productivity per well has declined by 42 percent. Since 1990, the number of operating gas wells in the U.S. has increased by 90 percent while the average productivity per well has declined by 38 percent.
- The U.S. is highly unlikely to achieve “energy independence” unless energy consumption declines very substantially. The latest U.S. government forecasts project that the U.S. will still require 36 percent of its petroleum liquid requirements to be met with imports by 2040, even with very aggressive forecasts of growth in the production of shale gas and tight oil with hydraulic-fracturing technology.
- An examination of previous government forecasts reveals that they invariably overestimate production, as do the even more optimistic projections of many pundits. Such unwarranted optimism is not helpful in designing a sustainable energy strategy for the future.
- Given the realities of geology, the mature nature of the exploration and development of U.S. oil and gas resources and projected prices, it is unlikely that government projections of production can be met. Nonetheless these forecasts are widely used as a credible assessment of future U.S. energy prospects.
- Future unconventional resources, some of which are inherently very large, must be evaluated not just in terms of their potential in situ size, but also in terms of the rate and full-cycle costs (both environmental and financial) at which they can contribute to supply, as well as their net energy yield.
And it continues along this vein in the Shale and Wall Street: Was the Decline in Natural Gas Prices Orchestrated?
- Wall Street promoted the shale gas drilling frenzy, which resulted in prices lower than the cost of production and thereby profited [enormously] from mergers & acquisitions and other transactional fees.
- U.S. shale gas and shale oil reserves have been overestimated by a minimum of 100% and by as much as 400-500% by operators according to actual well production data filed in various states.
- Shale oil wells are following the same steep decline rates and poor recovery efficiency observed in shale gas wells.The price of natural gas has been driven down largely due to severe overproduction in meeting financial analysts’ targets of production growth for share appreciation coupled and exacerbated by imprudent leverage and thus a concomitant need to produce to meet debt service.
- Due to extreme levels of debt, stated proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs) may not have been in compliance with SEC rules at some shale companies because of the threat of collateral default for those operators.
- Industry is demonstrating reticence to engage in further shale investment, abandoning pipeline projects, IPOs and joint venture projects in spite of public rhetoric proclaiming shales to be a panacea for U.S. energy policy.
- Exportation is being pursued for the differential between the domestic and international prices in an effort to shore up ailing balance sheets invested in shale assets.
So now that you’ve read these short snippets, think you or anyone else will be putting any money into the gas boom?
Greetings from California!
February 17th, 2013
OUT OF THE OFFICE!
Posting is sporadic until we get back.
It’s been SO long since I’ve been here, and I most miss February at the loading dock in a lawn chair!
The main thing I’ve noticed is that growing patterns have changed. There are hoop houses all over on the south end of Hwy. 101, and further up, there are grapes EVERYWHERE, oh my, what a difference. And it’s GREEN. Very very different.
Also learned yesterday — the redwoods are dependent on the fog for their moisture, and there are now 75% fewer days of fog than there were 100 years ago. The average age of the trees we saw yesterday was 850-1,000 years.

Best of all — the elephant seals:
Last Mayor Egan post before Council meeting
February 11th, 2013
Here’s my latest missive to the Red Wing City Council, the final comment before tonight’s City Council meeting. CLICK HERE TO WATCH IT. We’ll be watching on the train – hope signal is good tonight!
My missive:
All –
Greetings from Chicago. FYI, I’m beginning a long planned vacation, and it’s not possible to rebook Amtrak without significant penalty, so with regrets, I will not be able to attend tonight’s meeting.
You will have some difficult but necessary decisions to make tonight.
There’s an important point I want to make about “our” Mayor Dennis Egan, and the options before the City Council. It’s not binary — it’s not either/or. Several people have said that he needs to choose one position or the other, framing it that there needs to be a choice of whether he will be “our” mayor or to represent frac sand interests. But it’s too late for that. He has already betrayed the people of Red Wing and his oath of office. He’s shown us his moral and ethical views, he’s demonstrated an inability or unwillingness to take the issue seriously, and he has shown the extent of his denial. That can’t be undone.
The issue before the council is Egan’s fitness as mayor, and not whether he should be given a choice to resign one position or the other. Whether he resigns as the “voice of frac sand” or whether he is removed from that position as the PR liability that he is, it doesn’t matter at this point if he’s no longer representing frac sand. With the facts of this issue, and with the Mayor’s behavior and public statements, the bottom line is that he can’t continue as Mayor because has shown us that he cannot be trusted to put the City’s interests first.
Mayor Egan has demonstrated that he’s not fit for office. He shouldn’t be mayor.
Not only that, Steve Murphy and I agree that this is an impermissible conflict. If Steve Murphy and I agree on something, it MUST be right!!!
Thank you for our attention to this issue. I urge you all to act mindful of the Code of Conduct for Red Wing elected officials and your oath of office.
Carol A. Overland
Vacationing in Chicago and on the way to L.A.p.s. I believe there are records of citizen complaints and comments that are missing from the packet and hope that the packets will be updated with all comments to date just prior to the meeting.
There is a lot more in the papers leading up to tonight’s meeting. I’m going to cut and paste so that when they disappear into archives, they’ll be accessible. First is the RW Beagle’s coverage:
Some citizens push for Egan to leave; he’s staying
By: Anne Jacobson, The Republican Eagle
The mayor said he doesn’t intend to resign.
The Red Wing Charter requires that five people sign before a recall committee can form.
“This has just got my blood boiling, how dare he,” Overland said.
Now from the Rochester Post Bulletin:
Our View: Red Wing mayor shouldn’t serve two masters
Posted: Friday, February 8, 2013 3:04 pm
Red Wing Mayor Dennis Egan says he doesn’t see a conflict interest between his new job as a lobbyist for the frac-sand industry and his role as an elected official. The trouble is, a lot of people do.“In my mind, there’s not a conflict,” Egan said.
“Would I ever be a lobbyist and hold public office at the same time?” Rehder said. “No.”
And on to the letters. The next two are a hoot, because Steve Murphy and I are actually agreeing on something. As I told the Council, if Steve Murphy and I agree on something it must be right.
Letter: Council should act if Egan won’t
Shame on lobbyist-Mayor Dennis Egan. It’s time for him to resign. If not, it’s time to eject “our” mayor from office. By: Carol A. Overland, The Republican Eagle
To the Editor: Shame on lobbyist-Mayor Dennis Egan. It’s time for him to resign. If not, it’s time to eject “our” mayor from office.
Mayor Egan, resign. If not, it’s time for the city of Red Wing to act.
And now Steve Murphy’s editorial:
Letter: City painted with political disdain
The recent developments surrounding the mayor of Red Wing and his employment with the sand mining industry as a paid lobbyist are extremely troubling. It matters not how you feel about the issue of frac sand mining or the use of hydraulic fracturing to harvest gas and oil; the distressing concern at hand is both a matter of law and one of integrity. By: Steve Murphy, The Republican Eagle
Neither of these instances holds true in Dennis Egan’s case.
I have heard Egan’s reasoning for not stepping down as mayor. His reasoning is simply ridiculous.
Steve Murphy formerly represented the Red Wing area in the Minnesota Senate.
Today’s Frac Sand developments
February 7th, 2013
Not only is it Hizzonor’s Birthday today, but he now says he lives in Red Wing! Imagine that! Maybe he’s learning something in his old age?
More importantly, today both the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health said in Comments to Winona County that a full blown Environmental Impact Statement is needed for the Dabelstein Yoder frac sand mine proposed in Winona County.
Minnesota Dept of Health Comment Letter February 6, 2013
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Comment Letter February 4, 2013
This snippet from the MPCA letter pretty much says it all:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff believes that the information provided in the EAWs is insufficient to fully identify and assess the environmental effects of the projects. The MPCA believes the necessary information can be obtained and evaluated most effectively by preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Consequently, we respectfully recommend that Winona County make a positive declaration on the need for an EIS for both projects and include within the scope of each EIS appropriate studies to abtain the lacking information as provided in Minn. R. 4410.1700, Subp. 2a, Item A.
The MPCA focused on “phased and connected actions,” looking at the multiple projects in the immediate area, operated by Minnesota Sands, LLC, and “cumulative potential impacts” addressing other projects that may interact with this one. MPCA also listed many items where there was “insufficient” information. What’s particularly surprising is that the applicants didn’t address air emissions, something that is so obvious, and which was an issue in the North Branch mining processing plant that was fined and shut down for operating without a permit.
The Dept. of Health was particularly interested in water, including wells and groundwater quality, and again, air quality. The MDH recommended a “Health Impacts Assessment” which would be a good way to characterize the issues and impacts on human health — as a part of the larger EIS — not in place of it.
This is an encouraging start. Two state agencies have recognized the potential for significant impacts associated with frac sand mining. Now let’s get to work and “do some digging.” Can ya dig it?
KARE 11 turns up the heat on RW Mayor Egan
February 7th, 2013
KARE 11 was down here in Red Wing yesterday, and they caught up with Alan. “It makes a laughing stock of Red Wing, that the Mayor would do this, would think that he can get away with this.” Here’s the video — City Council President Lisa Bayley said it very succinctly, “you have to choose one or the other.” Showing a big file of emails, she said “You have to be very, very careful, those two things just cannot touch.” Egan looks like he’s feeling the heat, steadfastly saying there’s no problem, that “the people of Red Wing knew I lobbied for controversial subjects when they voted for me.” “These mines, those family owned Minnesota businesses, are not looking at mining the bluff, they’re not looking at mining the area.”
Photo of Maiden Rock frac sand mining operation across the river
Oh, right, Mayor Egan… get a clue! This is NOT acceptable. It’s time to resign.
MN mayor’s new ‘frac’ job stirring up controversy
Keep those emails coming to the Red Wing City Council members — tell them what you think of this:
sebion3@gmail.com, lisa.bayley@ci.red-wing.mn.us, deanhove@charter.net, michael.v.schultz@charter.net, peggy.rehder@ci.red-wing.mn.us, ralph.rauterkus@ci.red-wing.mn.us, marilyn.meinke@ci.red-wing.mn.us
And copy the Mayor and City Administrator too:
dennis.egan@ci.red-wing.mn.us, kay.kuhlmann@ci.red-wing.mn.us
Faux News 9 has a poll — weigh in!
Faux News – Red Wing mayor hired for frac sand lobbying – poll!
On Minnesota Public Radio today:
and

