Legalectric

IGCC Kemper plant lawsuit

August 6th, 2014

Thanks to John Blair, Valley Watch and Bruce Nilles for the heads up on this IGCC project settlement. We fought off one here, the Excelsior Energy Mesaba Project, which took a lot of people, a lot of groups, a lot of approaches and a lot of coalition, and thanks to all, we do not have a coal gasification plant in Minnesota.

What’s disturbing is that they get to run this boondoggle $5.2 billion dollar project (initially billed as $2.6 billion) at all, though they are shutting down older coal plants and converting to natural gas. It’s the most expensive power plant in history, and guess who’s paying for it?

Mississippi Power, Sierra settle coal litigation

Mississippi Power, Sierra Club settle coal power dispute

Posted by Carol A. Overland

Filed in Power Plants - includes Mesaba coal gasification

No Comments »

Progress on West? Another old tree down…

August 6th, 2014

OH NOOOOOOOO… We’re losing another big beautiful tree today. Diesel fumes are particularly intense. The noise these days is unreal, industrual-strength jackhammer on a bucket breaking up rock and digging down to build the wall foundation. They’re getting down, all right!

Posted by Carol A. Overland

Filed in Disasters, Other

No Comments »

Zip Rail – Olmsted County Regional Railroad Authority

August 1st, 2014

For those of you interested in how we got to where we are on this, take a look at what the Olmsted County Regional Railroad Authority has been doing:

Board Packets & Minutes

Regional Railroad Authority

Meeting Date	Packets	Minutes
June 23, 2009	Packet (117KB)	Minutes (13KB)

January 19, 2010	Packet (38KB)	Minutes (9KB)

June 22, 2010	Packet (11KB)	Minutes (10KB)

December 14, 2010	Packet (43KB)	Minutes (8KB)

January 18, 2011	Packet (49KB)	Minutes (13KB)

September 27, 2011	Packet (837KB)	Minutes (11KB)

October 25, 2011	Packet (69KB)	Minutes (29KB)

November 22, 2011	Packet (23KB)	Minutes (14KB)

January 17, 2012	Packet (65KB)	Minutes (8KB)

February 21, 2012	Packet (60KB)	Minutes (12KB)

April 24, 2012	Packet (26KB)	Minutes (15KB)

September 25, 2012	Packet (1140KB)	Minutes (51KB)

January 22, 2013	Packet (28KB)	Minutes (9KB)

August 27, 2013	Packet (161KB)	Minutes (17KB)

January 21, 2014	Packet (296KB)	Minutes (17KB)

June 24, 2014	Packet (36KB)	Minutes

Posted by Carol A. Overland

Filed in Political Sense (non?), Rail

No Comments »

Zippy Kenyon Zip Rail meeting!

August 1st, 2014

Nearly 400! And asking questions that need to be asked, and expecting answers about a project that could have immense impact and even more cost! “The people” get it.

For more info, see www.goziprail.org and Midwest High Speed Rail Association.

Comments due by August 6, 2014. Send comments to:

info@goziprail.org or

MN DOT Passenger Rail Office ATTN: Zip Rail

395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 470

St. Paul, MN 55155

So last night, I’m at the Zip Rail meeting, blasted down from Red Wing, greeted everyone at the door, handed out some flyers, didn’t have nearly enough, and was standing in the back listening to the same ol’, same ol’ rap, on and on. Chuck Michael, then Garneth Peterson, then Chuck again, yawn… and getting irritated hearing the song and dance with little of substance, so I went into the commons, the meeting was broadcast out there, writing out a few things to hand in, zzzzzzzzzzz … it’s pushing 7, meeting end time, and I’m following the discussion, nothing exciting, winding down, so I hit the road. I felt good about getting some questions and info on how to comment into people’s hands. All in a day’s work…

But DAMN! Left too soon!!! This meeting, the people stood up and let them know what they were thinking!

Here’s the report in the Post Bulletin:

Fireworks erupt at Zip Rail meeting in Kenyon

BRETT BOESE, bboese@postbulletin.com

KENYON — Zip Rail representatives traveled to Kenyon on Thursday night and were greeted by an ornery crowd of nearly 400.

It was the fourth area meeting of the week on the proposed high-speed rail connecting Rochester to the Twin Cities, but the first in which many rural residents of Dodge and Goodhue counties weighed in. People packed the auditorium and let project manager Chuck Michael have it during a biting, free-flowing exchange that went an hour over the scheduled time — and could have gone much longer had the school’s janitorial staff not stepped in to clear out the building.

Michael, who led much milder discussions earlier this week in Rochester and Inver Grove Heights, was able to keep his sense of humor while being put through what one audience member described as a “buzzsaw” of questions and critiques.

“I’m not seeing anyone raising their hand to trade places with me,” Michael said.

Rep. Steve Drazkowski, R-Mazeppa, was among those who implored citizens to attend the meeting and voice their concerns regarding the project, which carries an unknown price tag and remains years away from fruition — if it ever becomes reality. The issues raised by citizens were varied, but most centered around one main theme: How is this project going to benefit anyone outside of Olmsted County and the Twin Cities? The questions echoed a point previously made by Dodge County commissioner Steven Gray.

‘Raped and pillaged’

Zip Rail officials are seeking public opinion, as part of the Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement, to help select a preferred route for the train, which would reach speeds of 220 mph. Eight potential paths are being considered that would connect a terminal in downtown Rochester with a northern hub at the Minneapolis International Airport and/or the Union Depot in St. Paul.

The proposed paths either parallel U.S. 52 or Minnesota Highway 56 and would involve acquisition private land through eminent domain. That issue inflamed rural residents, many of whom have fought similar legal battles in recent years over CapX2020 transmission lines and wind turbine projects.

“I can’t believe these people,” said Greg Soule, a Goodhue County resident who collected a list of about 50 names after the meeting to start a Zip Rail opposition group. “It’s like they want us to be their donkeys and not get a thing for it.”

“It appears this area is OK to be raped and pillaged by large (projects),” added Nora Bryson Felton, who is running for Goodhue County commissioner this fall.

Michael and Minnesota Department of Transportation official Garneth Peterson attempted to explain the need for the project to an unreceptive crowd. Michaels said 40,000 employees commute to Rochester on a daily basis, and that number is expected to grow to 70,000 by 2034, thanks to Destination Medical Center.

Rochester also gets up to 3 million visitors per year, a figure that’s projected to double in the next 20 years.

“It’s really important to think about transportation as fueling that growth,” Peterson said. “Economic growth can’t happen if people can’t get there.”

Hader farmer Heather Arndt, who said she’s spent 100 hours studying Zip Rail in the past two months, offered a withering critique of those numbers. If the Zip Rail is aimed at daily commuters with one-way tickets costing about $30, a full year on that system would cost more than $14,000 and would simply cut the commute time roughly in half.

Michael then asked Arndt to summarize the rest of her point, which drew the crowd’s ire. She continued for nearly 10 more minutes before receiving a standing ovation from many in the audience and setting the tone for the rest of the night.

‘Back to the drawing board’

Drazkowski and Goodhue County commissioner Dan Rechtzigel were more succinct in their criticism, but no less pointed. Rechtzigel said placing the rail parallel to Highway 56 would require blocking off 24 intersections, while the U.S. 52 option would mean blocking more than 40.

“You’re asking a lot for no real reward in Goodhue County,” said Rechtzigel, a K-W teacher. “It will benefit Rochester and the Twin Cites, and that’s fine — until you start blocking off our roads.”

Added Drazkowski: “I think it’s time to go back to the drawing board.”

Many were frustrated by Michael’s inexact responses. One citizen sarcastically thanked the project manager for actually answering his first question — more than 2 hours into the meeting.

Michael acknowledged the frustration, but said many of the answers sought by the public will be discovered only after further studies are completed.

“It’s a bit early in the process and that’s a frustrating thing,” Michael said. “We prefer not to guess too much because we might be wrong.”

Posted by Carol A. Overland

Filed in Other, Rail

No Comments »

Tonight in Kenyon — Zip Rail

July 31st, 2014

Today was the Zip Rail meeting at the Kenyon High School, and it was PACKED. I printed up 80 flyers, but ran out and could have handed out another 80. WOW! It’s great to see people so interested.

I’ve been learning about this project, and it takes some digging to get information. My goal is to encourage people to ask questions, and where there’s the opportunity, to file comments. In this case, we have until August 6, 2014, to send comments in for scoping on the “Tier 1” EIS. This means that we should tell them what all we think should be covered in the environmental review, and send the comments to:

Comments due by August 6, 2014. Send comments to:

info@goziprail.org or

MN DOT Passenger Rail Office ATTN: Zip Rail

395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 470

St. Paul, MN 55155

What I’ve found is that it’s hard to find anything. Start looking, and what do you find? Zip! The best information source is the Midwest High Speed Rail Association, and to look at their “Studies/White Papers” page. I’m most interested in “Midwest” “HSR” (high speed rail) and “Economics,” and HERE IS THE RESULT for that.

Here is my favorite for basic information, it’s got some basic cost estimates, particularly on p. 105 of 151, for the Metro – Chicago route, take a quarter of that and it’s a good starting ballpark figure, just over $7 billion (the number I hear being thrown around is $1 billion, and no way, no how, so just pay no attention and do some digging):