Ma’am, come down off the pole!
June 27th, 2015
Ma’am, come down off the pole!
Come down off the pole! Ma’am, Ma’am, come down off the pole!
“… white men have an equality resulting from a presence of a lower caste, which cannot exist where white men fill the position here occupied by the servile race.”
Jefferson Davis, 1858, Pres. of the Confederate States.
Time for it to come down. Even Walmart gets that…
The Supreme’s have been busy
June 26th, 2015
Here are the actual Opinions (and the Dissents are … stunning… hilarious… OH… MY… DOG!):
13-1371_6-25-15_Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.
Turns out our own Rep. Frank Hornstein has a tie to this — very cool:
I feel a personal connection to history today. Around a year after my Mom’s death in 1998, my father sold the Cincinnati home I grew up in to James Obergefell and John Arthur. A few years later I visited that home with my father, brother and sister and James and John gave us a tour, proudly showing off the renovations and improvements they made to the place. Scott Dibble’s text to me a few minutes ago says it all: LOVE WINS. Thank you James Obergefell for your courage and activism and may John Arthur’s name forever be a blessing
FERC rejected Petition for Rulemaking, on to DOE!
June 26th, 2015
After a day in the bowels of FERC’s docket system as RM15-22-000, FERC rejected the BLOCK Plains & Eastern Clean Line Petition for Rulemaking. It’s a binary thing, has to be either one or the other, so now it’s in the DOE’s hands.
So, DOE, what cha gonna do? You’ve been thinking about it, but it’s been 10 years since Section 1222 was passed.
And the grand finale of the Administrative Procedure Act, Section 553:
FERC accepts BLOCK Plains & Eastern Petition for Rulemaking
June 23rd, 2015
YEAAAAAA!
When filing BLOCK Plains & Eastern Clean Line: Arkansas and Oklahoma’s Petition for Rulemaking, because it doesn’t have a docket number, it’s not an existing docket, it must be filed, and then FERC staff decides whether to accept it, the next step in deciding what to do with it. Our Petition for Rulemaking has been accepted! Now they will have to decide what they’ll do with it!
Here’s the FERC Notice:
Acceptance for Filing ——————— The FERC Office of the Secretary has accepted the following electronic submission for filing (Acceptance for filing does not constitute approval of any application or self-certifying notice):
Accession No.: 201506165371
Docket(s) No.: RM15-22-000
Filed By: BLOCK Plains & Eastern Clean Line: Arkansas and Oklahoma -Signed By: Carol Overland F
Filing Type: Utility Accounting Request(??)
Filing Desc: Petition for Rulemaking of Regulations for Filing Applications and Review of Transmission Line Projects under Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 of BLOCK Plains & Eastern Clean Line under RM15-22.
Submission Date/Time: 6/16/2015 2:25:40 PM
Filed Date: 6/16/2015 2:25:40 PM
Your submission is now part of the record for the above Docket(s) and available in FERC’s eLibrary system at: http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20150616-5371
If you would like to receive e-mail notification when additional documents are added to the above docket(s), you can eSubscribe by docket at: https://ferconline.ferc.gov/eSubscription.aspx
Here are the filings (each was advised of the other Petition for Rulemaking so everyone knows):
Note we also filed a Petition for Rulemaking with the DOE’s Office of General Counsel. Let them argue between themselves and figure out just who is going to do it and when and get it MOVING FORWARD! Rulemaking is long overdue, and FYI, DOE, you have no business making any decision, doing any review, without rules.
Here’s why it’s good the Mesaba Project was not built!
June 14th, 2015
Remember the Excelsior Energy Mesaba Project (see Legalectric posts and Citizens Against the Mesaba Project’s “Camp Site”), the boondoggle coal gasification plant that almost was, the project that got every legislative perk possible, got financing and grants based on wishful thinking and that “something else” that we just can’t identify (without which, who would think this was a good idea? That plant that was to be built, according to the special legislation for this project, on a site WITH INFRASTRUCTURE? This site… dig the infrastructure!
Anyway, it wasn’t built here. But a similar plant WAS built in Indiana, the Edwardsport plant owned by Duke Energy. As with the Mesaba Project it was proposed at a reasonable price, legislators were first told $700 million, and then it went upwards of $2.11 billion. For Edwardsport, same story, and that price kept going up, up, up, and in Indiana, it was so extreme that costs recoverable from ratepayers were capped by the Indiana Public Utility Commission at $2.9 BILLION. It was allowed to be built, and it started operating, sort of… Average output has been 41%, when an 80+% capacity factor was promised. Repairs? That’s putting it mildly. Now they’re going to try to get cost recovery for that.
Now, let’s not all forget all the money given by the Joyce Foundation to support this nonsense.
+++++++++++++
Here’s a specific and eloquent comment from Michael Mullet, very involved in opposition to the Edwardsport fiasco: