Carbon capture & storage and seismic activity
January 19th, 2020
There’s mention of “carbon capture and storage,” a/k/a/ CCS, in a DRAFT bill, SC5558-6, being considered by Minnesota’s Senate Energy Committee:
The part about CCS is this:
What’s the problem? Get out your waders…
This DRAFT bill reads as if “carbon capture and storage” is real. It reads as if “carbon capture and storage” can capture at least 80 percent of carbon dioxide generated. It reads as if carbon captured can be stored by injection. It reads as if “transferring” for use (EOR?) is a good thing.
Why are we going through this again? Well, for example, in the most recent IRS 990 posted for Great Plains Institute, they got $937,931 for “Carbon Management.”
Money talks. And they are pushing it as if — what a crock — look at this “report” and check p. 3 of 4, and decipher what it means — it’s just a map that shows ethanol plants, coal plants, EOR (note North Dakota has no little green triangles!) and saline formations (interesting that our salty aquifer way way down underneath Minnesota isn’t shown):
The Importance of Carbon Capture to Decarbonizing the Electricity Sector
They post this chart as if CCS plays a significant role, but look at the small little slivers of CCS shown:
- Carbon capture is not real and cannot readily capture 80%.
- To be stored, carbon must be transported to storage, and where might that be and how will that storage be monitored?
- Use of carbon for fracking has potential for and causes earthquakes, seismic activity, and associated disasters.
Years ago, July 2005, to be exact, National Geographic had a great article about impacts of gas drilling on water in Wyoming, “All Fired Up,” a/k/a/ “Tapping the Rockies,” with stunning photography by Joel Sartore:
It’s gone now… links dead… I have the hard copy, but…
Anyway, Wyoming is an example of the disasters of fracking, North Dakota another, and around Youngstown, OH, where they were injecting fracking waste, yet another:
Fracking Led to Ohio Earthquakes
Oklahoma Toughens Oil Fracking Rules After Shale Earthquakes
There’s a great piece on The Narwhal the other day about fracking and injecting gas into the earth and the instability of an existing dam and the “Site C” dam now under construction:
Peace Canyon dam at risk of failure from fracking-induced earthquakes, documents reveal
Let’s trot this one out again:
But there is a silver lining to this:
Trump Dumps ‘Clean Coal’ Research Despite Lauding Its Potential
Budget Guts U.S. Carbon Capture, Storage Research
Then this:
Coal industry begs Congress to save carbon capture from Trump
And so then this:
White House will promote carbon capture technology in climate change fight
EPA finalizes Trump administration’s coal-friendly climate plan
Once again, IGCC toady org Clean Air Task Force is out there in front:
Everyone Wants Carbon Capture And Sequestration — Now How To Make It A Reality?
And from that article, DOH, what we’re seeing here with Xcel, wanting to keep burning but sell their surplus on the market:
None, however, has pledged to stop burning fossil fuels.
This is the CCS market’s holy grail.
From the “have we learned nothing,” gleaned in all those years working on Excelsior Energy Mesaba Project, the zombie boondoggle from hell, here are a few Legalectric posts:
More on Carbon Capture Pipedream
June 28th, 2010
DOE announces Capture & Release program
May 7th, 2008
Walton’s Bill Grant and “low carbon coal”
May 14th, 2007
Carbon sequestration still ain’t ahappenin’…
February 9th, 2007
Suddenly, a Plan for Carbon Capture and Sequestration
October 19th, 2006
It’s not rocket science… “carbon capture and storage” is not real.