Now what’s Micheletti up to?
April 21st, 2015
Doesn’t this guy ever quit? New legislation with new option, wanting to change the law to allow a “biomass” plant on the Mesaba Project site. WHAT? Aren’t they paying attention to the Laurentian Energy Authority’s unworkable “biomass” projects in Hibbing and Virginia, the “biomass” plants that don’t have enough feedstock and so are burning coal? Did they forget that the MPCA has only issued one woody biomass permit, for Laurentian (Hibbing and Virginia) and that that permit was violated, so extremely that the MPCA issued fines and reworked the permit?
LEGALECTRIC POST: Laurentian “biomass” Air Permit Draft (second time around)
LEGALECTRIC POST: “Biomass” violates air permit – fines likely
DOH!
Thanks to a little birdie for the heads up on this.
Here’s the change, hidden in Senate File 2101:
Today, say NO to lines 191.4 – 191.19 of Senate File 2101.
GARBAGE made for a busy day!!!
April 21st, 2015
There’s the Garbage Queen Victoria Reinhardt, Ramsey County Commissioner, promoting the Joint Powers of Ramsey and Washington County’s dream of buying a RDF processing facility in Newport, one that’s now a private entity that they’re contracted with to handle their garbage! Why buy it? Why lock the counties into decades of grinding up garbage? They couldn’t answer that.
And it’s a bit of a conflict, as after they grind it up and turn garbage into RDF, they send it down here to burn it. Thanks Ramsey & Washington Counties. Let’s be clear here — you need to deal with YOUR garbage problem, and not send it to us, and not put it in our lungs.
They talked some about “what ifs,” like dreams/nightmares of anaerobic digestion and garbage gasification, but that is not dealing with their problem. It’s an issue of REDUCTION, REUSE, RECYCLING. How difficult is that?
Here’s their site and read between the lines for the plan:
Last night’s meeting was at Century College, which was 916 Area Vo-Tech when I went there and emerged in 1983 with a Truck Driver Certificate and the first of a few jobs of over the road driving that got me through a BA at Metro State! It’s changed a lot, big expansion, and the trucks are no longer there up against 694.
The next “Talkin’ Trash” garbage open houses will be 6:30 to 7:30 p.m.:
• Tuesday, April 21, in the Marsden Room of the Ramsey County Department of Public Works building, 1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive in Arden Hills.
• Thursday, April 23, in lower level conference room 14 at the Washington County Government Center, 14949 62nd St.t N., Stillwater.
• Monday, April 27, in at the Newport City Hall, 596 Seventh Ave., Newport.
• Tuesday, April 28, in Auditorium A of the Wilder Foundation, 451 Lexington Parkway N. in St. Paul.
Here are the latest reports that they’ve generated… they lose it by only looking at burning or landfilling — there’s a much wider range of options. And the Foth Report (first up) should make you froth:
Foth Analysis of Mixed Waste Processing
This study examines the potential of adding Mixed Waste Processing Technology at Newport and the costs associated with adding the technology.
Report
Ownership Analysis
This analysis includes looking at the current Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) processing facility and also looking at other technologies that may be used to process MSW.
Analysis
Governance Report
This policy study investigates the governance options available to the counties, describes the process to implement and consequences associated with each.
Report
Waste Delivery Assurance Analysis and Options
This document provides an overview of options for assuring delivery of mixed municipal solid waste, and potentially other solid wastes, to the Newport Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) Facility or another resource recovery facility involving Ramsey and Washington Counties.
Report
Technology Comparative Analysis
This report compares the three options analyzed in the Preliminary Resource Recovery Feasibility Report to the current RDF System and to landfilling.
Report
Preliminary Resource Recovery Feasibility Report
This report addresses the technologies selected for continued evaluation by the Ramsey/Washington Counties Resource Recovery Project as part of the future of waste processing decision process.
Report
Overland’s Plains & Eastern DEIS Comments
April 20th, 2015
Quick comments — this project is bizarre, a private project proposed on request of DOE (with applicant ringleader a former DOE employee) that has no demonstrable need. ???
Here’s the link for the DEIS, from their site:
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Plains & Eastern Clean Line Transmission Project (DOE/EIS–0486; Draft EIS) is now available
I do hope the DOE will explain how they intend to review this under Section 1222… it’s all too bizarre for words!
Again! Legislative Auditor on IRRRB!
April 19th, 2015
Big thanks to Citizens Against the Mesaba Project for the heads up!
Minnesota’s legislative auditor will investigate IRRRB _ Duluth News Tribune
This specifically includes the $9.5 to Excelsior Energy and its Mesaba Project:
$9.5 was loaned, but as of 2008, with interest, that number was up to over $14 million, per the Legislative Audit report of 2008 (full report below):
Here’s an overview from CAMP:
Here’s the 2008 Legislative Auditor Report_IRR Loans to Excelsior Energy
And on this site, also posted in 2008:
Excelsior Energy under the auditor’s microscope
Here are some of the pertinent documents from that round — Read it and see for yourself. Anyway, mncoalgasplant.com wanted to dig around in the IRR’s records, so we started in filing this and that…
Or was it a Data Practices Act request?
All of the above!
We got quite a bit of information, and here’s Ron Gustafson’s spreadsheet, it may not be all inclusive, but some choice tidbits are there:
IRR Receipts – Final Review
The IRRRB’s handling of money, particularly handing it over to Excelsior Energy a/k/a Tom Micheletti and Julie Jorgensen, was appalling, and it’s about time this got another review. The Mesaba Project was one of the most obvious and disturbing examples of special legislation ever, from the legislatively granted perks like a mandate of Power Purchase Agreement, to eminent domain for a private company, to the Renewable Development Funds to the IRRRB money, pouring money down the rathole.
What were theys thinking? And what was the pay-off? The pay-off to Xcel Energy was that they got to keep their Prairie Island nuclear plant going. What was the pay-off to legislators who agreed to this? What was the pay-off to the “environmental” groups, particularly Bill Grant, then Izaak Walton League, who Tom Micheletti furiously accosted after the deal was temporarily stopped, yelling, “WE HAD A DEAL!!! BUT WE HAD A DEAL!!!” What did Bill Grant’s organization and its supporters get?
YES! House deletes Black Oak/Getty language!
April 15th, 2015
YEAAAA! Progress! The House has indeed deleted the Black Oak/Getty language in the 1st Engrossment of HF 843.
1st Engrossment of HF 843
It’s not over yet — there’s still the Senate. Keep up the pressure on them to remove it when it hits the floor:
John Marty (66, DFL) Energy Committee Chair
651-296-5645
E-mail: UseMail FormJohn A. Hoffman (36, DFL) Energy Committee Vice Chair
651-296-4154
E-mail:
sen.john.hoffman@senate.mnDavid J. Osmek (33, R) Energy Committee Ranking Minority Member
651-296-1282
E-mail: sen.david.osmek@senate.mnTorrey N. Westrom (12, R) Senator for Black Oak/Getty area
651-296-3826
E-mail: sen.torrey.westrom@senate.mnMatt Schmit (21, DFL) “My” Senator in Red Wing
651-296-4264
E-mail: sen.matt.schmit@senate.mn






