2021 PJM State of Market Report
March 10th, 2022
Here it is:
PJM 2021 State of the Market Report
Note that where NERC does not project a significant decrease in coal production, PJM’s coal generation increased from 2020 to 2021 (now we do need to keep in mind that 2020 was a very low demand year):
Here’s an overall summary:
The big takeaway is that demand has increased over 2020, which is no surprise. Note the “Average Hourly Load” and “Average Hourly Generation” and compare with “Installed Capacity.” Capacity is essentially twice Average Hourly Load and Average Hourly generation (and note exports and imports are included).
And just for shits and giggles, here’s the PJM LOCATIONAL MARGINAL PRICING MAP!
And here’s MISO’s too:
MISO LMP Map
What it looks like right now in MISO:
Overland intervenes in NSP/Xcel Rate Case
December 24th, 2021
A little holiday gift for my good friends at NSP/Xcel Energy:
The issues I’m concerned about, at this point, are primarily transmission related:
This should be intense, guaranteed, but fun, eh?
Cardinal-Hickory Creek blocked again
November 3rd, 2021
First the state court, though there’s that matter of a HUGE bond, and now federal court.
Here’s the Order:
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/zgvomrqomvd/rulingLine.pdf
Bottom line:
From REUTERS (!):
Judge delays construction on parts of $500 mln U.S. power line
Coal ramping UP! Xmsn shipping it OUT!
June 24th, 2021
From a post about 2,100 MW of new transmission:
Developers of 2,100 MW MISO-PJM transmission line choose engineering firm
Let’s think about this a bit. This is a MISO to PJM transmission project. Transmission serves what’s on the line. In MISO, (see above) it’s coal, followed by natural gas, both fossil fuel, and those two followed by nuclear, the most toxic, dangerous, and expensive generation.
Amid all the bluster about climate change, coal generation has ramped up over the last year. Factor to consider — in May of 2020, not much was happening anywhere, so increased generation from then seems likely, to be fair, we need comparison to 2019, BUT, clearly the coal plants are NOT being shut down. And with our transmission build-out over the last 20 years, they can ship and sell it anywhere. What is it going to take to get this fossil generation shut down?
And look at PJM’s mix:
And again, much of the coal in PJM was smaller plants, except for that monster in West Virginia, smaller plants that were too expensive to run, not at all marketable, so they were shut down. MISO is another story, with large coal plants, transmission to get it from any Point A to Point B, and probably the last coal plant to be built, Warren Buffet’s 700MW MEC coal plant, served by the transmission build-out through southern Minnesota and across Iowa.
Why would we need more transmission? WE don’t. THEY DO, it’s a major part of their new business plan. As Lisa Agrimonti so aptly stated in a recent Grid North Partners Conference, it used to be about NERC reliability criteria, “a pretty simple story,” but now, “we need this transmission line to deliver energy more broadly” and it’s a more complicated need story.
Yeah, that’s what they’re wanting to do, for sure!
With the change from reliability to the general “we want it” corporate greed = need, how can a project be challenged?
Collective goals? REGULATORY CAPTURE!
June 2nd, 2021
Here we go again. It’s bad enough that CapX 2020 is morphing into CapX 2050/Grid North Partners, but they’re having a “conference” (sign up here) in a couple weeks.
Look at the Chair of this panel, none other than the Chair of the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, and the description:
… TO MEET OUR COLLECTIVE GOALS?
Remember the toadying for CapX 2020? Remember the toadying for Excelsior Energy’s Mesaba Project coal gasification? Remember the toadying for Prairie Island/NSP/Xcel Energy’s nuclear plants, particularly Prairie Island circa 1994 and 2003?
This sort of thing has been an issue before, and former Chair LeRoy Koppendrayer has been the only one to acknowledge this type of participation as an issue — this was in 2007:
IEDC gets carried away
When this happens, I contact the PUC and register concerns, and have always been assured that they know well the boundaries.
And, well, here’s Commissioner Tuma on DOE Nuclear Waste panel circa 2016:
DOE “Consent-Based” Nuclear Waste Mtg.
This was also an issue with Commissioner Reha when she went off on a coal gasification junket to Belgium and promotion of CapX 2020! See the John Tuma link, above, for this with active links:
When the promotion and bias is so blatant, I’m not about to watch silently. Earth to PUC Commissioners, here are the PUC’s rules:
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/7845.0400/
https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/7845.0700/
And when you see something, say something?
Ummmm, right…
ALJ “INVESTIGATIVE REPORT PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. § 216A.037”
Listen to Commissioner Tuma’s words that were the subject of our complaint at the link above. And the ALJ’s report delivers this warning:
I guess it will be an informal complaint, eh?