Xcel, cost taxation? WHAT?
April 30th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-19.png)
Just wow… It’s the sort of thing that makes my head burst!
Association of Freeborn County Landowners has been challenging the invasion of Freeborn Wind, a/k/a Xcel Energy a/k/a Northern States Power into this existing community.
Hundreds of meetings, filings, over the last FOUR YEARS, and we got the first contested case hearing ever for a wind project in Minnesota… the first in 20+ years of siting wind projects, and the first time a projects comes to the test, the ALJ recommends the permit be denied!
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2018/10/20180531_1808401.jpg)
The Recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-20.png)
The Public Utilities Commission does a perverse and contorted 180 and lets Freeborn have their way, and the public, residents be damned.
Freeborn? PUC upends ALJ’s Freeborn Wind Recommendation
Then 17 turbines left for Iowa, but 24 remain.
… we get tossed out by the appellate court, which affirmed the Commission’s decisions and Orders.
Freeborn Wind appeal – we lose…
And earlier this week, they serve this:
Let’s see… they have open access to ratepayer pocketbooks, they’re reimbursed for their costs! BY US! We ratepayers have to pay! Meanwhile, for the public to show up, and to challenge for FOUR YEARS on this project, or any project, like the Mesaba project, or CapX 2020!, people hold garage sales, put grain in at the elevator, a silent auction in a tornado, and plain old arm-twisting to cover our comparatively nominal costs.
Our objection just filed:
NOW THEY THINK WE SHOULD PAY THEM $3,312.75?
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2009/08/finger-baby.jpg)
Meanwhile, don’t cha wonder how’s Xcel Energy doing these days? Their 1Q report just out… More customers, decreased sales, and stock soars:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-21.png)
Hmmmmmmm, remember that Texas storm? Here’s the impacts:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-23.png)
Xcel easily tops earnings estimates
Ain’t capitalism grand…
Soon… Freeborn Wind appeal
April 14th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-4.png)
AFCL’s MERA suit dismissed
November 29th, 2020
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2014/09/gavel.jpg)
The judge’s Order arrived, and it’s disappointing, to put it mildly.
The judge’s decision focused on the belief that these matters had been litigated in another forum, so we couldn’t do it again. Litigated? Intervention is not necessarily litigation, though certainly AFCL intervened in the Freeborn Wind docket, and certainly did not in the Plum Creek, Three Waters or Buffalo Ridge dockets. And in this District Court proceeding, Lisa Agrimonti let me know that another attorney would be lead in this case, that their firm was putting a “litigator” on it. Hmmmm, Agrimonti’s not a litigator, and put Alethea Huyser on the job, so the firm admits that what we, Freeborn Wind and AFCL, were doing in those dockets was not litigation, right, I get it… uh-huh… sigh…
How do we deal with these systemic problems in wind siting? 25 years and still no rules? Setbacks aren’t sufficient to prevent noise standard violations and people need to leave their homes to be able to sleep, so far two families reached settlements and buyouts to get away from noisy turbines. Wind projects pay out for blinds so people can sit in the dark, or suggest going to Florida, to avoid shadow flicker inflicted on them. At the PPSA Annual Hearing last week, the DOT said it wants the 250 foot setback from roads reevaluated. The Public Utilities Commission has actual and constructive notice of these problems for years, yet nothing happens…
Let’s see… rulemaking Petitions denied over and over. The only time we’ve had a contested case, the judge recommended denial because developer had not demonstrated compliance with noise standard, and recommended a lower number of hours as “acceptable” for shadow flicker.
Once more with feeling — the ONLY time, the FIRST time, in Minnesota history where there was a contested case on a wind siting permit, the only time it could arguably be said the issues were “litigated,” the ALJ recommended that the permit be denied!
WE WON!!! ALJ Recommend Freeborn Permit be DENIED, or…
May 14th, 2018
The PUC turned that around in a private settlement with the developer, excluding intervenors.
Freeborn? PUC upends ALJ’s Freeborn Wind Recommendation
September 21st, 2018
Now what… How many more complaints, how many more landowner settlements, before they fix this mess?
What’s the point of intervening, becoming a party? What’s the point of raising issues at the Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing (for 23 years)? What’s the point of over and over raising the systemic problems in the PUC’s wind siting? How do we work “within the system” when the system is broken?
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2020/11/20170920_161416-1024x576.jpg)
ALJ “INVESTIGATIVE REPORT PURSUANT TO MINN. STAT. § 216A.037”
September 12th, 2020
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2011/12/screamhomer.jpg)
Association of Freeborn County Landowners had filed a Complaint against Public Utilities Commissioner John Tuma and Chair Katie Sieben:
AFCL files Complaint against Tuma & Sieben
They filed their response and shipped it off to Office of Administrative Hearings for an investigation (note statute says “hearing” … oh well…):
AFCL Complaint forwarded to OAH for hearing
Here’s the result, hot off the press:
There’s no requirement of public participation? Minn. Stat. 216E.08, Subd. 2. And parties? No mention. What’s the point of being a party? And following that Office of Legislative Auditor report, guess it doesn’t matter, no one is paying attention.:
Public Utilities Commission’s Public Participation Processes – OLA-Report
Notice of a new topic on the agenda isn’t required? Yeah, I guess the notice statutes don’t matter.
Talking to a participant is not ex party contact? The County is indeed a participant…
Next step is that it goes to the Commission to rubber stamp it.
Who cares? Listen to this:
AFCL Complaint forwarded to OAH for hearing
August 12th, 2020
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2020/08/OAH_stassen-building.jpg)
Association of Freeborn County Landowners filed a Complaint with the Public Utilities Commission against Commissioner John Tuma and Chair Katie Sieben last week.
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2020/08/PUC_JohnTuma-1-200x300.png)
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2020/08/PUC_KatieSieben-200x300.png)
The PUC responded with this… oh my… and an Affidavit from John Tuma, he DID contact a Freeborn County Commissioner about pre-empting the township’s Ordinance and local control:
And under the statute, Minn. Stat. §216A.037, the PUC must refer it to the Office of Administrative Hearings:
The administrative law judge assigned to the ex parte complaint proceeding by the Office of Administrative Hearings shall conduct a hearing investigation and shall issue a report within 30 days after the matter is referred. If the administrative law judge determines that the report cannot be properly completed within that time period, the judge shall report that fact to the commission within the 30-day period and shall file a final report within a reasonable time thereafter, no later than 60 days after the referral to the Office of Administrative Hearings.
Minn. Stat. §216A.03
… so today, it was referred. GOOD!
Why? Well, this is about the July 16, 2020 meeting, the one where you just have to listen to the video – yeah, we’ve got the transcript, but the video just conveys so much more: