So another utility toady thinks I’ve got my head implanted…
October 4th, 2009
.
Apparently Jonathan Travers, “Engineer of Knowledge” is another utility toady or self-declared energy wonk, and thinks I’ve got my head implanted regarding my comments about the MAPP line and about PSE&G’s dissing Midwest transmission. EH? I’d say my Google Analyics stats say otherwise. And then there’s the little energy birdie who admitted the other day that Legalectric is one of his first stops in the morning!
Who is Jonathan Travers? Haven’t a clue, his reputation does not exceed him! Google’s got very little to say. Hmmmmmmm… There is a “Travers” on the Dorchester County Council, Ricky Travers. This “Jonathan Travers,” he’s got a blog, Jonathan Travers Chronicles, with only a handful of postings that are focused on blasting opposition to the Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway (MAPP) transmission line, i.e., Dorchester County’s Dorchester Citizens for Safe Energy and Eastern Shore Land Conservancy, who are having some success in fighting the MAPP line, and though Travers’ blog’s banner states “Debate Through Logical Argumentation Only. Not For Flamers!” the level of discourse he’s posting is not even up to “Horse’s Ass Awards” and such:
Here are his comments about my MAPP post, “MAPP Transmission Line Under the Microscope” a couple weeks ago:
Submitted on 2009/10/04 at 9:18amTo the attention of Legalectric Blog.
You make the statement, “this transmission line is not needed.” Per logical argumentation, you make (sic) no backup facts to support this opening statement. As any English writing course teaches, this is just poor writing skills (sic). As it has been (sic) well documented by “The Public Service Commission” report (sic) released last December (sic) warned that the state could experience rolling blackouts as early as 2011 to helped (sic… really!) people understand the reason for MAPP’s conception. So with just your opening statement, you have negated your argument and quite poorly I might add (how “sic” can it be?).
Overland comments: “backup facts” about transmission line not needed can be found by searching this site for “decreased demand” and “PJM annual report” and PJM Load Capability. Ummmm, Hello, I’m a writing major, and your comment about “poor writing skills” isn’t about writing, it’s about evidence that you want. Don’t worry, it’s there, just look! “Rolling blackouts” is hysteria, blown away by DEC’s annual Energy Plan, showing sharply decreased congestion on the Delmarva peninsula:
You then go on to post the article from the Star Democrat written by Dustin Holt who may have a journalistic degree but by his statements he has no knowledge of electrical engineering. I have spoken with Mr. Holt in the past and within a short amount of conversation, it was quite apparent that he did not even have the basic understanding of what he was writing about. Mr. Holt starts off by referencing statements from Libby Nagel who has self proclaimed herself (sic) president of the Dorchester Citizens for Safe Energy. It is my evaluation that with her lack of electrical engineering knowledge, Ms. Nagel would be better off proclaiming herself President of the Dorchester’s chapter of the Mickey Mouse Club (SIC!). So once again you have quoted a source that does not have adequate credential (sic) to even be speaking on the subject negating your argument again.Overland comments: I posted the article as a good example of on-the-ground activism, where people work to increase awareness of their issue, and Dorchester Citizens for Safe Energy did a great job! They got press coverage, their elected officials showed up, and pro-MAPP people are flailing wildly — that’s a measure of success! Libby IS, not was, the President, and IS self-DESCRIBED President, she was elected President by the organization, it’s “described’ not “proclaimed.” Your “evaluation” is really immaterial. Ms. Nagel has all the “credential” necessary to speak as an affected community member and President of the primary opposition organization. The article I posted says she’s the “Chairman,” and not “President.” Really!
Let me try to explain it this way. If you run just one transmission route like Ms. Nagel is stating would be (sic) like having one extension cord with a hundred electrical appliances, tools, etc. plugged into it. It will not be long before you have overloaded the circuit causing a short circuit or even causing a fire. It is the diversification that the multiple routes provide so that the electrical load required by the Delmarva Peninsula (sic) is what makes the electrical grid secure and stable.
Overland comments: This is such convoluted and tortured writing that it’s hard to tell where to put the “sic” parentheticals in. WHEW! Anyway, back to “substance.” WTF? I see only one reference to Ms. Nagel in the article, “Dorchester Citizens for Safe Energy Chairman Libby Nagel said the power line would require about a 200-foot right-of-way.” Nowhere in this article is Nagel advocating for “just one transmission route,” and I don’t think Nagle advocates for ANY transmission route, she’s stating that a new transmission line is not needed!
I would suggest that your readers can get the correct and accurate arguments with regards to MAPP at my site http://www.jonathantraverschronicles.blogspot.com/
Overland comment: I would suggest that my readers check out the site and comment away!!! Have at it. My readers will be able to easily dissect that site.
Good day,
Jonathan Travers
Oh, he’s not THAT Jon Travers???
OK, now on to his next comment, on the “PSEG’s Izzo disses Midwest Transmission” post :
Submitted on 2009/10/04 at 2:54pmTo the attention of Legalectric Blog.
In your earlier posting you made the statement, “PJM, the private utility transmission promotion entity, has admitted that the Indian River to Salem part of the line is not justified, and have taken it off their wish list.”
Counter Point:
To start off with PJM simply stands for Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Maryland and the state of Delaware has now (sic?) been included since its conception. PJM is an oversight committee (EH?) made up of knowledgeable people in the industry but they do not tell power utilities to build anything (EH?). It is the utilities (sic) to come up with their own plan to address the problem of the soon (sic) lack of electrical power for their regions. Again your statement you are passing on are (sic) incorrect(sic) negating you (sic) argument.Overland comment: PJM is more than a committee, it’s a formal business organization. PJM IS the utilities, and per PSE&G testimony in the Susquehanna-Roseland case, PJM is telling them to build the line. Now obviously PJM has no authority, but if they press the matter with FERC, FERC could direct the utilities to build it. It’s much more than an “oversight” committee, it’s an organization that is comprised of utilities, and they not only address electric reliability issues, but they control and manipulate the electric market. “Lack of electrical power?” Somebody hasn’t been reading the SEC filings, reserve margins, and annual reports, EARTH TO MARS, there’s a substantial decrease in electrical use and need, we aren’t going to have a power shortage. Project Mountaineer is not a plan of the individual utilities’ making. JCSP is not a plan of individual utilities, CapX is not a plan of individual utilities…
“A little knowledge is a very dangerous thing,” and the writer of this blog has demonstrated their sever (sic) lack of knowledge in this subject by the statements presented.”
Overland comment: Oh, uh-huh…
Now with this posting they are stating their case as if there is only one transmission line that needs to be considered. For those educated in electrical engineering, it is plain that the writer of this blog does not even have the basic understanding of Ohms Law. What MAPP is offering are multiple access points for electrical transmission routes.
Overland comment: Ummmmm, “they?” And who is advocating for transmission? This is the same thing that “Travers” says about Nagel, who said nothing of the sort. This mantra does not fly. Multiple access points? For what generation? Let’s get clear about that…
For anyone else whom (sic) should (sic) like to inform themselves more proficiently on this subject, I suggest you go to http://www.jonathantraverschronicles.blogspot.com/ where this has all been address (sic) before.
Thank you,
Jonathan Travers************************************
Overland comment: Whoever wrote this is clearly not a native speaker/writer nor in any position to critique writing. Content, well, anyone can criticize content, but I’d guess that “Travers” is a retired engineer or a newly imported engineer who has not had experience with the capitalist system and the shift of focus of PJM, MISO, etc., to economic dispatch, a market system, where economic considerations are primary, and where the game in transmission is how to build out as much as possible while shifting cost-allocation elsewhere, for someone else to pay, anyone. Then PJM gets shot down by the 7th Circuit and all their transmission cost apportionment plans are in limbo.
PSEG’s Izzo disses Midwest Transmission
September 30th, 2009
Did I hear that right???
I’m fighting with PSEG out in New Jersey, representing Stop the Lines on the Susquehanna Roseland transmission line. PSEG can be vile… but on this one point, PSEG’s Ralph Izzo is right. Now, if we can just get him to be consistent.
Transmission is not rocket science, and Izzo statements reflect that he understands what Midwest transmission is all about — $$$ and coal. He and PSEG have joined the many who are standing up to Midwest transmission plans. Now, is the Midwest paying attention? As PUC Chair Boyd said at the last Legislative Energy Commission meeting, they need a solid business plan. Guess what — they don’t have one, DUH!!!! There’s no market (Doesn’t Chair Boyd or anyone else in the room think there’s something a little too cozy about Boyd advocating for transmission with MISO???).
Today at a conference, PSEG’s Izzo let loose and let them have it:
Here’s some propaganda from PSEG:
In short:
Now just who does this sound like?!?!?!?! Hilarious… dig this, though he’s not admitting the INTENTIONALITY of the transmission scam:
And this broad view so contradicts their Susquehanna-Roseland transmission plan, which is all about coal from Amos = it’s the NE part of “Line 1” in Project Mountaineer. PSEG, you can’t have it both ways! Let us hope that now that he’s spouting opposition to the Great Midwestern Transmission Scam he’ll see the scam of New Jersey transmission. At least we’ll now have this to use. THANK YOU, RALPH IZZO!
New Jersey’s BPU delays Susquehanna-Roseland hearing
September 10th, 2009
Just in, the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities has delayed the Evidentiary Hearings for PSE&G’s (and PJM’s!) Susquehanna-Roseland transmission line, from the week of October 19 to the week of November 16!
Even better, the Discovery that was due right now is now not due for two more weeks! Two more weeks of figuring out how to torture those poor witnesses for PSE&G!!
For more info, see STOP THE LINES!
And that fits well with the CapX 2020 Brookings hearings, that were supposed to begin November 23 but now probably starting the week after.
7th Circuit tosses out FERC & PJM cost apportionment
August 13th, 2009
I was a big Posner fan in law school, mostly because he was so much fun to pick on, I so hate the “Chicago school.” But here’s another Posner, doing good! It’s a hilarious opinion, all the better because it so clearly tells FERC and PJM what to do with their rate shifting cost apportionment. GO POSNER!
Here’s the decision:
Two issues in this case:
1) PJM/FERC pricing based on marginal cost v. pricing including sunk costs. That one went for PJM/FERC, and American Electric and others lost in just a few paragraphs.
2) Where the action is — Ohio and Illinois Commissions objected to the 500+kV cost allocation on a pro rata basis, that “their rats should be raised by a uniform amount sufficient to defray the facilities’ costs.”
What’s particularly interesting to me is that this is all about “Project Mountaineer,” which PJM doesn’t even want to acknowledge exists! the Susquehanna-Roseland line that I’m working against is the NE part of line 1, and the MAPP line through now “just” a part of Delaware is the NE part of the southern line, line 4. Here’s the magnitude of Project Mountaineer – the Susquehanna-Roseland line is QUAD 500kV plus double circuiting the existing 230kV line, that’s one big project:
FYI, in the Cudahy dissent, he did some digging, and there is a Project Mountaineer tootnote quoting PJM stating that Project Mountaineer “would bring about substantial congestion relief and reliability improvements increasing Midwest-to-east transfers by 5,000 MW.” See Ventyx, Major Transmission Constraints in PJM (2007).
A quick sidebar… FYI, from Delaware Electric Cooperative 2009 Energy Plan – “CONFIDENTIAL”, arguing for the MAPP transmission project…
… and they report that transmission congestion is down 75% to 275 hours ANNUALLY! Really… so for that 275 hours we should build the $1.2 MAPP project? HOW STUPID DO YOU THINK WE ARE?
OK, back to Posners 7th Circuit decision. It was PJM’s idea, approved by FERC, to hit up all the utilities, and Illinois, a BIG example of the problem, would have had to pay out some $480 million while not receiving one dime of benefit. PJM used the theory that, well, PJM used to do it this way all the time before in massive infrastructure buildouts, but as Posner reminded them, that was then and this is now, PJM is a lot different now, Illinois wasn’t even part of the picture.
Posner was pissed off that there was no data at all to support their desired allocation, no data, no specifics about difficulties in assessing benefits, no lawsuits about inequities, no particulars, “[n]ot even the roughest estimate of likely benefits to the objecting utilities… oh yes, he let them have it… for page after page… and notes that FERC “brief devotes only five pages to the 500kV pricing issue.” FERC seems to presume a similar brainwashing in the courts that they and utilities presume of Commissions and legislatures, one that I see to often, that frantic claim of URGENT need, ‘WE’RE GOING TO FREEZE IN THE DARK IN AN INCUBATOR WITHOUT A JOB” theory, presented despite documented long term decrease in demand across the country. Once more with feeling, HOW STUPID DO YOU THINK WE ARE?
Oh, these guys irritate me. Anyway, check out this decision and consider the impact on all the 500kV and above projects applied for or waiting in the wings.
Susquehanna-Roseland Intervenor Testimony!
July 17th, 2009
It’s here, the testimony of the Intervenors against PSE&G’s Susquehanna-Roseland transmission project, well, it was last week, and FINALLY I’m getting around to posting it.
STOP THE LINES needs donations to keep up the fight. Donations can be made by check payable to: Stop The Lines PO Box 398 Tranquility NJ 07879. You can also use paypal — just go to STOP THE LINES and scroll down.
Tax-deductible checks are also accepted, made out to “NJ Highlands Coalition”, and put “Stop The Lines” in the memo
Mail to: NJ Highlands Coalition, ATT: Stop The Lines, 508 Main St. #3, Boonton NJ 07005
*************************
COALITION OF TOWNS
Exhibits will take a while — there are a LOT
BKS-1 – PEC Motion to VA Supreme Court
BKS-5 – PSEG 2009 Q1 Earnings Call Transcript
BKS-7 – Rosengren Reuters June 5, 2009
BKS-8 – PEPCO PR MAPP May 19, 2009
BKS-10 – Rebecca Smith, Wall Street Journal
FREDON PALS & WILLOW DAY CAMP