FERC Order nixes coal and nuclear subsidies
January 9th, 2018
Good try, DOE Secretary Perry, but you’re outta here! Yes, it’s true, a tRump stacked FERC said “NO!” to a proposed rule to subsidize coal and nuclear plants, generation with 90+ days of fuel on hand, outmoded generation plants that are oh-so-suffering while they try to compete in the wholesale “free market” and sinking south fast because costs of production are high and market prices are higher. I’m shocked, utterly shocked, and very pleasantly surprised!
What did Perry ask for? Here’s the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:
Secretary Rick Perry’s Letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Bottom line? Gotta snort, “Now that a quorum has been restored at the Commission, I am confident…” (click for larger version):
SOL!!!
That’s SNORT out loud… how’s that workin’ for ya, Secretary Perry?
What he thought was a slam dunk was a 5-0 rejection of preferential “out of market” treatment for certain generators. Nope, ain’t gonna happen.
Here’s the FERC Order, straight from the horse’s mouth. I’m most appreciative of the many articles and posts that include the primary document. It’s crucial to be able to read the FERC Order. This is REAL NEWS!
There are a lot of people railing and wailing about subsidies these days, but it’s very lopsided, and I’m not hearing the complaints about all the subsidies of coal and nuclear. If you want to complain about subsidies, slash them across the board. “Free market” right, the essence of capitalism, right?
Tonka has arrived!
April 21st, 2017
Tonka has arrived from GSRAW in Wisconsin, who gave us Summer”
Ode to Summer…
Tonka is quickly adjusting to her home and her new roommates. She did well on the trip, and today, greeted me by running up to me smiling. Here ears are up, her chin is up, and she’s a happy grrrrrl.
She’ll do fine! She even met Nigel, nose to nose (note the powerline in the background):
… and they’re fine, although she’s a little unnerved by the chickens!
Wyoming is fossil fuel country, coal plants everywhere, here a mine mouth plant on west side of Kemmerer:
And gas… EVERYWHERE, there were wells all the way up 30 and 89 up until the mountain pass, where the rain turned to snow, UGH! This is what Wyoming looks like just north of Little America:
Remember that 2005 National Geographic article about the gas wells in Wyoming? Here’s my post with links to that article and videos — in particular, check out the “Bad Water” section, the woman holding a glass of “water” from her well reminds me of Nancy Prehn and her water when they’re pumping at the gas underground storage near Waseca:
Drilling in the West – in National Geographic this month
Up here towards Jackson Hole there are no gas wells, I don’t know if that’s because there’s no gas, that it’s not BLM land up for “lease” (at way too reduced rates), or because if the impact of $$$ in this area.
Heading back soon… and yeaaaah to GSRAW for making this adoption happen!
Clean Power Plan? MPCA wants comments!
August 3rd, 2015
That’s the Coal Creek plant, a photo I took on a tour. If you’re an electric co-op member in Minnesota (elsewhere too?), they offer tours regularly, and it’s something you should do! Check your co-op’s newsletter for info.
State Register Notice:
Just released FEDERAL Clean Power Plan:
Clean Power Plan Final Rule (PDF)(1560 pp, 3.3 MB, About PDF) – August 2015
Look at how the “adjusted” Minnesota’s baseline levels due to Sherco 3 being out for nearly 2 years:
The EPA examined units nationwide with 2012 outages to determine where an individual unit-level outage might yield a significant difference in state goal computation. When applying this test to all of the units informing the computation of the BSER, emission performance rates, and statewide goals, the EPA determined that the only unit with a 2012 outage that 1) decreased its output relative to preceding and subsequent years by 75 percent or more (signifying an outage), and 2) could potentially impact the state’s goal as it constituted more than 10 percent of the state’s generation was the Sherburne County Unit 3 in Minnesota. The EPA therefore adjusted this state’s baseline coal steam generation upwards to reflect a more representative year for the state in which this 900 MW unit operates.
Clean Power Plan Final Rule (PDF p. 796 of 1560).
And from the state, which acknowledges imminent release of FEDERAL Clean Power Plan Final Rule , also released today, just in from the MPCA (direct quote):
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued a request for comments on possible rule amendments to bring Minnesota into compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Clean Power Plan. You can read the full request in the August 3, 2015, edition of the State Register, available at www.comm.media.state.mn.us/bookstore/mnbookstore.asp?page=register.
The amendments we are considering will help Minnesota meet standards established by the Clean Power Plan, which sets state-specific carbon dioxide emission targets and requires each state to submit a plan detailing its strategy for meeting the targets. As of State Register press time, we have not yet started drafting a plan because the EPA has not yet published the standards that Minnesota’s plan will need to meet, so the MPCA requests public input to help guide our considerations of methods for meeting the EPA’s targets, as well as any other objectives that the state’s plan might include.
Stakeholder meeting agendas, notes, and other related documents are posted on the website for this rulemaking at www.pca.state.mn.us/w9y3awr.
To access information about a particular Minnesota rulemaking, visit the Public Rulemaking Docket.
Tonight – Leslie Glustrom in Mpls on Xcel Franchise
December 14th, 2011
Colorado’s Leslie Glustrom, hot off the Boulder campaign to oust Xcel Energy from its Boulder electrical franchise (two birds with one stone, first, Xcel is out, and second, the PSC is out too!) will be featured in a conversation about municipalization of electric utilities – where a city takes over its own energy purchases and distribution, and yes, even generation too, to the extent possible!
TONIGHT!
Municipalization in Minneapolis?
Xcel’s Minneapolis Franchise
Energy Options for Minneapolis
Boulder Colorado’s Leslie Glustrom
Wednesday, December 14, 2011, 7:30 pm
UTEC Center – Room 102B
1313 5th St. SE
Dinkytown, Mpls
Boulder, Colorado, has long gotten its electric service from Xcel Energy. Now, Boulder seems well on the way towards kicking out Xcel and setting up a publicly-owned electric utility. Boulder voters have made the choice, and Xcel lost the municipalization referendum in which it reportedly spent over ten times as much as the “municipalization” advocates.
Boulders ratepayers decide to explore a world without Xcel or the PUC.
Minneapolis, Minnesota, has also long received its power from Xcel Energy, and the agreement between the city and Xcel expires on Dec 31, 2014. This is the time to explore options, as Boulder has done!
Leslie Glustrom, Research Director of Clean Energy Action, headquartered in Boulder, has been close to the municipalization issue in Boulder and is visiting Minnesota. Leslie is a nationally-prominent energy figure and so effective that the Colorado Public Utilities Commission has banned her from intervening in Xcel proceedings!
Come meet with Leslie and other interested citizens to learn more about possible alternatives for electrifying Minneapolis.
TONIGHT at 7:30 p.m.
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
UTEC Center – Room 102B
1313 5th St. SE
Dinkytown, Mpls
COAL?!?! What are they thinking?
June 29th, 2010
How much did the “Partners for Affordable Energy” pay for this? You can find them at www.powerofcoal.com and www.poweringourlives.com.
Here’s the revealing part, the very last paragraph:
The St.PPP picked up this “article” and yet omitted that closing truth:
Here’s the Bemidji Pioneer article:
Future energy needs still depend on coal
By: Brad Swenson, Bemidji Pioneer
About 50 percent of the nation’s electricity comes from coal, he said. “If not coal, then what? What’s going to make up that volume of fossil fuel?”
Read the rest of this entry »