PPSA Annual Hrg – TOMORROW!
December 19th, 2021
And AGAIN! It’s the Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing! You can attend in person, MASKED, or via webex or phone. Primary documents are posted below.
December 20, 2021 @ 9:30
PUC Large Meeting Room
121 – 7th Place East – 3rd Floor
St. Paul, MN
Comments? BE SURE TO NOTE DOCKET NUMBER FOR COMMENTS:
PUC Docket E999/PR-21-18 & OAH Docket 65-2500-37832
Written comments will be accepted through January 10, 2022, by 4:30 p.m.
Note notice only to those “who have requested notice” above? Nope, notice should be to all who are on service and project lists for projects active in the calendar year. Thankfully EERA does give notice to a lot more than just those “who have requested notice” (see “Notice & Service Lists” link posted above).
From the EQB Monitor:
Here are the projects EERA’s Summary says were approved — note that for wind it does NOT list applicable parts of 216E, such as Minn. Stat. 216E.03, Subd. 7!
Meanwhile, the update of rules for PPSA siting, Minn. R. ch. 7850, is stalled out again, WITHDRAWN by the PUC last Thursday, supposedly based on many comments made over the last few weeks by a bunch of people and orgs who were utterly absent through the NINE YEARS of this rulemaking proceeding. My grits are FRIED! The PUC Agenda Item starts at the very end of the meeting, and note the bogus statements about the “why” of this rulemaking. Let’s be clear here — it’s due to the 2005 legislative changes, SIXTEEN YEARS AGO. See PUC Docket R-12-1246. Good grief… Discussion starts at 2:48:28:
PPSA Annual Hearing Report
December 30th, 2020
It’s out, the Administrative Law Judge’s report on this year’s Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing. The hearing this year was particularly frustrating, horrible turnout, and I’ve got a part in that, because I didn’t spend the massive amounts of time getting notice out to people, drumming up interest, so there is that…
Here’s the Report:
Here are a couple of documents to check out that I included with a written comment:
PPSA Annual Hearing NOW
November 20th, 2020
RIGHT NOW! It’s the PPSA Annual Hearing… sigh… here we go again.
Go to webex, Event # 146 311 2620. The powerpoint slides will be here (and will also be filed on eDockets).
To be able to comment, you have to get on the phone 866-609-6127, Conference ID: 4449079, and to comment, you need to press #1 and get in queue.
Here is the Commerce info about this year’s projects:
And for the record, folks, note that wind is not exempt from many of the parts of the PPSA:
2020 PPSA Annual Hearing
October 27th, 2020
It’s that time again, the Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing.
Friday, November 20, 2020
10 a.m. start
It’s all online, and the only way to participate is over the phone.
Here’s the notice and directions on how to show up:
Here are some prior PPSA Annual Hearing reports:
Here are the reports from prior PPSA Annual Hearings:
2006 Report to PUC – Docket 06-1733
2007 Report to PUC – Docket 07-1579
2008 Report to PUC – Docket 08-1426
2009 Report to PUC – Docket 09-1351
2010 Report to PUC – Docket 10-222
2011 Report to PUC – Docket 11-324
2012 Report to PUC – Docket 12-360
2013 Report to PUC – Docket 13-965
2014 Summary Report– Docket 14-887
2015 Summary Report – Docket 15-785
2017 Summary Report – Docket 17-18 – Download
2018 Summary Report – Docket 18-18 – Download
Why hold a PPSA Annual Hearing — sometimes I do wonder what the point is, because nothing is ever done about it — but it’s statutory:
216E.07 ANNUAL HEARING.
PPSA Rebuttal time – due 1/28
December 27th, 2019
An odd notice came out today — an extension of the Power Plant Siting Act Annual Hearing comment period, “due to late-filed materials…”
Late filed materials??? Whatever could that be… SNORT!
Naaaah, more likely than not it’s the Comments I’ve filed in all the related wind dockets, plus the PPSA dockets, regarding “ground factor” an inappropriate use of anything but 0.0 as a ground factor:
That’s all about the many wind projects that are improperly using 0.5 and 0.7 ground factor. 0.0 is the only ground factor because the turbine is elevated, and from the source to the “receptor” it is a DIRECT hit! It’s really not hard to understand.
There are so many projects, ALL of the wind projects listed in this year’s Commerce-EERA handout for the PPSA:
These projects were all permitted using bogus noise modeling with GIGO input assumption of 0.5 or even 0.7 for ground factor!!! REALLY! These:
And these:
Guess somebody is wanting time to rebut! May it means we need a contested case, eh?!?! SNORT!
But then, even developer’s expert Mike Hankard agrees that 0.5 is not appropriate for an elevated source like a wind turbine:
It’ll be interesting to see what they have to say.
To look at the PPSA Annual Hearing docket go HERE and enter docket 19-18, using 19 (year number)- 18 (docket number).