Xcel – Undergrounding in Taylors Falls
April 4th, 2009
Shame, shame, shame, Xcel…
Remember way back when, Chisago II, when then Northern States Power did a deal with the City of Taylors Falls and the City of St. Croix Falls? I won’t forget the cities’ joint siging meeting, because the then Mayor of St. Croix Falls, now a felon, ordered me arrested when I inquired during public comment period about the “Project Mitigation Fund and Committee.” Guess he didn’t want that discussed, didn’t want it questioned… thanks to all the hollering from the audience I didn’t end up with three hots and a cot!
This was a three way deal. Well, Xcel has just unilaterally, without permission of Taylors Falls and St. Croix Falls, altered provisions of the construction specifics that were material terms of the agreement.
From the agreement:
See??? Undergrounding “to the existing dam facility on the St. Croix River…”
Simple enough… but here’s what it says in the PUC Order of February 20, 2008:
… and..
So in the agreement, it is undergrounded all the way to the river, and in the PUC Order, it’s above ground from Hwy. 95 to the river on H-frame structures. EH? Well, what does that look like? Here’s the map:
Off to the right, the wider road where there’s a box pointing downward at the wider road where it says “UG Termination Structures” and the line representing transmission changes to sort of a weird dashed line just after the road, that’s Hwy 95 where just east of the highway, it changes from underground to overhead. If you follow it from Hwy. 95 to the right, east, you’ll see it go over County Road 16, Wild Mountain Road and then over to the St. Croix River.
What does Taylors Falls think about it? They’re unhappy enough to have rattled Xcel’s cage, and got this response from Xcel:
Xcel’s explanation why transmission line was overhead when it was supposed to be underground is… well… read it for yourself:
Oh, right, Xcel, because you got everyone together EXCEPT those who are party to the agreement and they agreed, yeah, seems like it’s OK… uh-huh…
I think a better response: “THAT’S DIFFERENT!”
Should the settlement agreement be amended? Xcel has this to say:
Xcel says there’s no need to amend the settlement agreement and that they’ve “complied with all of the provisions relative to Taylors Falls.” Oh… uh-huh…
St. Croix Falls, the other party to the agreement, is outraged! They took it to Congressman Obey:
Can you hear their eyeballs rolling, hands thrown up in disgust?
And what’s this about the school in St. Croix Falls?????
Xcel is getting a little too big for its britches!