FERC Order nixes coal and nuclear subsidies
January 9th, 2018
Good try, DOE Secretary Perry, but you’re outta here! Yes, it’s true, a tRump stacked FERC said “NO!” to a proposed rule to subsidize coal and nuclear plants, generation with 90+ days of fuel on hand, outmoded generation plants that are oh-so-suffering while they try to compete in the wholesale “free market” and sinking south fast because costs of production are high and market prices are higher. I’m shocked, utterly shocked, and very pleasantly surprised!
What did Perry ask for? Here’s the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:
Secretary Rick Perry’s Letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Bottom line? Gotta snort, “Now that a quorum has been restored at the Commission, I am confident…” (click for larger version):
SOL!!!
That’s SNORT out loud… how’s that workin’ for ya, Secretary Perry?
What he thought was a slam dunk was a 5-0 rejection of preferential “out of market” treatment for certain generators. Nope, ain’t gonna happen.
Here’s the FERC Order, straight from the horse’s mouth. I’m most appreciative of the many articles and posts that include the primary document. It’s crucial to be able to read the FERC Order. This is REAL NEWS!
There are a lot of people railing and wailing about subsidies these days, but it’s very lopsided, and I’m not hearing the complaints about all the subsidies of coal and nuclear. If you want to complain about subsidies, slash them across the board. “Free market” right, the essence of capitalism, right?
Arkansas Delegation, Section 1222, and Clean Line
September 15th, 2015
Yesterday, the Arkansas Delegation hit Plains & Eastern Clean Line where it counts — a line drive to the Secretary of the DOE with this letter:
Maybe this letter should have been headed “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST.” Plains & Eastern Clean Line applied under Section 1222 of the Federal Energy Policy Act of 2005.
For reference, here’s Section 1222 of Energy Policy Act 2005.
Many of the points raised were ones brought forward in testimony, public comments, and media reports of the Plains & Eastern Clean Line transmission line proposal. Questions the AR delegation raised include basic project information and:
- transactions and costs related to participation in Section 1222;
- obvious failure to qualify because it is not in a “national interest electric transmission corridor” under Section 216(a) of the Federal Power Act;
- improper use of Federal eminent domain authority undermining states’ rights;
- that the project is outside the statutory mission of federal Power Marketing Administrations (Southwestern PMA is proposed by Plains & Eastern Clean Line as partner in its project);
- project boundaries extend beyond the statutory boundaries of Southwestern Power Administration;
- costs for this private project could be transferred to electric utilities and their customers and this possibility has not been walled off/mitigated to insulate Southwestern’s customers;
- concerns about “non-completion” assessment of costs and prevention/mitigation have not been addressed;
- Clean Line’s assertions that they will pay certain taxes to local communities have not been investigated and verified;
- use of existing federal rights-of-way and federal land;
- Clean Line’s substantially incorrect, misleading, and/or inconsistent statements, which are basis for rejection or denial of the application, have not been addressed;
- draft EIS “did not meet the expectations of an inclusive, community-driven feedback process” expected of administrative agencies, and public comment periods and involvement of landowners and stakeholders was insufficient public engagement;
- questions regarding tribal consultation; questions regarding DOE position on state’s role in siting under Section 1222;
- impacts of traversing Mississippi Flyway on waterfowl and migratory birds, together with resultant economic and recreational impacts;
- impacts on public recreation on outdoor recreation in Arkansas;
- use of non-governmental email accounts for Department deliberations regarding this project.
Like WOW! I’m impressed — this letter is a work of art.