Chauvin GUILTY 3 of 3
April 20th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-10.png)
You say there’s gonna be a recall…
April 20th, 2021
6-1 vote? You LOST!
Here’s another recall, recall denied 6-1 by City Council.
Blue Earth denies recall petition
BLUE EARTH — After nearly an hour of discussion which included a report from an attorney and input from members of the public and the council themselves, the Blue Earth City Council voted 6 to 1 to deny a petition calling for a recall election of a council member. The decision came at the beginning of the regular City Council meeting last Monday night. A group of citizens had previously presented the petition calling for a recall election of councilman John Huisman. The reason given was that Huisman had violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution due to his co-signing a letter to KBEW radio station concerning removal of a radio program. The letter also threatened to organize a boycott of the station if the program was not removed. At a previous special council meeting the council decided to postpone a decision on the petition until after having an independent attorney study the legalities. At Monday’s meeting, attorney Christopher Kennedy of Mankato gave both a verbal and written report. At the end of Kennedy’s four-page report, he stated the members of the recall committee on this matter had done everything that was required of them to institute the recall of the council member, following all the requirements set out in the City Charter.“The language of the Charter, however, is in conflict with the provisions of the Minnesota State Constitution that there must be an allegation of malfeasance or nonfeasance in order to remove an official,” Kennedy stated. “The allegations in this matter do not meet that definition - so the recall petition should be denied.”Kennedy also stated he felt that if the council did accept the petition, councilman Husiman’s attorney could take the matter to District Court and would win a decision that the petition was not valid. Mayor Rick Scholtes was the lone vote against the motion to deny the petition.“I feel we need to follow our City Charter now,” Scholtes said. “And in the future change the Charter to follow the constitution.”Kennedy had stated earlier in the meeting that in the future the city of Blue Earth should amend the Charter to include language that is consistent to the Minnesota State Constitution.
https://www.fairmontsentinel.com/news/local-news/2021/04/07/blue-earth-denies-recall-petition/
This article has a little more meat on it:
BE Council denies recall petition
Vote is 6-1 after hearing attorney’s opinion on the legal issues
This is the part that is most important, the notion of malfeasance or non-feasance:
Once more with feeling… Ya say ya wanna do a recall, but I say NO! NO! NO!
Judge Wright’s TRO
April 19th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-9.png)
Despite this court order, that evening:
This is contempt of court. Contact Gov Walz:
Freeborn Wind appeal – we lose…
April 19th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-5.png)
… sigh… Totally ignores ALJ Recommendation after contested case hearing, setting up the issues that followed:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-8-1024x308.png)
A new noise study not provided until AFTER the initial permit was granted, there was NO demonstration that they could comply, and what they provided after the first permit granted, and before the second decision, was NOT subject to a contested case. Earth to Mars, it’s “material issues of FACT,” not “issues” that must be demonstrated to get a contested case, and these are thousands of pages of facts not in evidence and not subject to contested case.
This is just so wrong, an application is NOT environmental review:
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-6.png)
And this — how could issues and facts NOT part of the contested case have been addressed in the contested case?
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/image-7.png)
New material issues of FACTS – FACTS not in existence for initial contested case, FACTS not provided until AFTER the initial permit was granted. “…relator therefore alleges no new material facts beyond those raised at the first contested-case hearing.” WHAT?!?!
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2012/11/manurespreader_newholland_example.jpg)
How’s this for new material FACT beyond those raised at the first contested-case hearing:
How many hundred pages of NEW material FACTS? All this was part of PUC record, AFTER the first permit was issued. All this was included as new material issues of fact in our request for a second contested case. All this was included in appeal. Yet:
My head is going to explode. Such deceptive word games, summarized with a demonstrably false statement.
America First Caucus exposed (& 86’d by Greene)
April 17th, 2021
![](https://legalectric.org/f/2021/04/AmericaFirstCaucus.jpg)
UPDATE: Greene cancels unveiling of “America First Caucus.”
*****************************
And they did it themselves… overtly racist, supremacist, nationalist, requiring “a certain intellectual boldness…” to out themselves as selfish jerks. Anyone ascribing to this doctrine has no business in government, and I’d just as soon see them ejected from the U.S.
I was going to pick a couple sections representative of the repulsiveness of this effort, but it’s all so bad… and here it is:
Read it and barf, be aware, and challenge this at every turn.