Fukushima Reactor 3 blows…
March 13th, 2011
New Explosion at Japan nuclear facility – CBS News
BOOM!
Oh great… I dug through my pile o’ mail and found our voucher to get potassium iodide — we can get it at the Target here in Red Wing or in Cottage Grove. Now I feel safe… right… life in a nuclear town.
Three injured, seven missing after explosion at nuclear plant
Are people getting how serious this is? Two reactors melting down?
Below, yesterday’s blast — today’s was much the same:
Grant Merritt weighs in on nuclear
April 14th, 2022
Grant Merritt in the STrib:
Counterpoint: Case still powerful against nuclear energy
It would be unsafe and costly for Minnesota to reverse the moratorium.
By Grant J. Merritt April 13, 2022
In response to “Times change. Minnesota nuclear moratorium must end” (Opinion Exchange, April 11), there are five reasons to retain Minnesota’s moratorium on building any more fission nuclear power plants.
The first is that ever since the Atomic Energy Commission began promoting them back in the post-World War II days, and over the ensuing 75 years, no acceptable storage locations have been found for the radioactive wastes.
The second reason is that these plants are prone to accidents, such as we had at the Monticello NSP nuclear plant on Nov. 19, 1971, when 50,000 gallons of radioactive water flowed into the Mississippi River. This caused the commissioner of the Minnesota Health Department to close the water intakes in the metro due to the threat to human health. That catapulted the accident into national news. Serious accidents occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant followed by the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear plants.
The third reason to oppose any more of these plants here or elsewhere in the U.S. is the threat of terrorism, now being experienced at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine.
The fourth reason is that licensing nukes is difficult due to opposition by many people, even though the U.S. government has preempted state regulation of potential exposure to water discharges. Thanks to action by former Gov. Wendell Anderson when he was a U.S. senator, air emissions are not preempted, so the state can hold hearings on air emission permits, which would no doubt be hotly opposed.
The final reason for continuing the moratorium is that building nuclear power plants is so excessively costly that the nuclear plant that was well underway to being built on the Savannah River in South Carolina was abandoned by voters.
For these reasons the Minnesota Legislature should not reverse the nuclear moratorium.
Grant J. Merritt, of New Hope, is a retired attorney. He was executive director of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, 1971-75.
Tsunami fear? Nope, reality!
January 15th, 2022
Warnings for West Coast, see U.S. Tsunami Warning Centers:
… and it’s hit Fukushima!
See simplyinfo.org: Fukushima Daiichi Hit By Tsunami 1.15.2022
NSP/Xcel Rate Case testimony on nuclear
December 30th, 2021
NSP/Xcel Energy’s Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant is just 13.4 miles away through our bluffs, and more like 9 as the crow flies. And don’t forget about Monticello, same GE reactor as Fukushima Di’iachi, upriver, also on the Mississippi.
FYI, the NRC’s page for:
Prairie Island Enforcement Actions (it’s been a while, is that a good thing?)
More Nuclear Storage at Monticello???
September 14th, 2021
Whatever for? We’ll find out. In essence, Xcel wants to extend the life of the plant past 2030, and to “continue operations of MNGP through the year 2040. So it’s more than “storage,” it’s the opportunity to keep that nuclear plant running. It’s the same GE design as Fukushima-Daiichi!
There’s a Comment period starting TODAY on Completeness of their application:
- Minn. R. ch. 7855 link is here to find Minn. R. 7855.0230 to 7855.0280 and 7855 0600 to 7855.0670.
To know whether the application is complete, you’ll have to check it out:
To file comments:
For more info, subscribe to the docket, and in your comments, ask to be added to the service to get everything that’s filed:
Happy reading!