April 17th, 2013
Here we go again. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) and… get this… the Environmental Integrity Project, have teamed up to do a deal with Flint Hills Resources, owned by Koch Industries, our great and good fiends, the Koch Bros.
Why is Environmental Integrity Project, a Washington D.C. entity, even involved in this?
Here’s the deal — download HERE it NOW before it disappears (they took it off the page, but the link still works) — here’s the captured Agreement:
Both are bragging about it in press releases:
Here are the parts of the above agreement that are a problem — they have agreed to not object to this project, and they have agreed to SUPPORT the project — does this sound like CapX 2020 all over again? They have also agreed not to assist others in any way, and to keep these requirements confidential! It’s enough to make me wonder if there are, as there have been in other deals, other agreements. Well, here are the specific parts that are so offensive and which are deemed confidential (click each piece for larger view):
The confidentiality provisions are disturbing — that they’re not to disclose the fact that they’re making their supportive comments as a material term of this agreement, and not to disclose these terms to anyone, “including but not limited to local, state or federal governing or regulatory bodies and agencies, and members of the public.” GOOD GRIEF!
Thanks to the STrib for getting this out in the open:
The Flint Hills Resources oil refinery in Rosemount has agreed to limit the growth of greenhouse gas emissions and curb other air pollution in a deal that removes potential obstacles to its planned $400 million upgrade of the refinery, the company said Tuesday.
Under the agreement reached with two environmental groups, Flint Hills also will contribute $1 million to a Minnesota effort called Project Green Fleet that helps owners of school buses, construction equipment and other vehicles retrofit diesel engines to make them cleaner. Flint Hills is a founding sponsor of the program, and contributed $1 million previously.
The project, slated to begin next year, would increase the daily construction workforce from about 500 to 1,000 for five years, and add about 100 permanent jobs, said Scott Lindemann, vice president and manufacturing manager for the refinery.
But Flint Hills’ plans faced potential opposition from environmental groups, including the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA), a nonprofit environmental law organization based in St. Paul that often intervenes in regulatory matters. That’s because Flint Hills, the state’s third-largest greenhouse gas emitter, needs state regulatory approval to modify its air quality permit to release additional emissions, including those linked to climate change.
Lindemann said the company reached out to the MCEA and the Environmental Integrity Project based in Washington to hear their views on the company’s plan to install energy-efficient technology that also offers some emissions benefits.
In the negotiations, Flint Hills agreed to changes in the project to curb the growth of greenhouse gases, although the upgrade still means an increase overall. Flint Hills also agreed to stricter limits on sulfur dioxide and volatile organic compound emissions, and to have an outside party audit its energy efficiency efforts.
Scott Strand, executive director of the MCEA, said his group generally opposes expansion of fossil fuels, especially Canadian tar sands crude oil that partly supplies the Rosemount refinery. He said the agreement addresses an immediate concern.
Strand said Flint Hills’ $1 million contribution to the diesel retrofit program will help curb emissions of fine particulates. That could help the Twin Cities avoid violating regional air quality standards and the imposition of federal regulations such as a return of vehicle emissions inspections, he said.
A spokesman for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which is reviewing the permit, said in an e-mail that regulators “so far are fine with what Flint Hills is proposing” and they expect to begin taking public comments on the permit in May or June.